MyCRA Specialist Credit Repair Lawyers

Tag: credit file

  • Privacy Law Reform To-Do List: Privacy Awareness Week 2013

    privacy law reform to do listIn our last post for Privacy Awareness Week 2013, we set out some actions you can take now for your family to get you up to speed and ready for important changes to the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) which will impact you. We include the specific things you can to do to support your ability to obtain credit and have your credit file looking its best when changes come into effect on March 2014.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    PrivacyWeek-Banners-R1 - 2013-3

    What can you do to support your credit file and ensure you look your best to Credit Providers? It will be essential from now and going forward to be mindful of what may constitute bad credit. Although as a consumer you are not privy to your credit ‘rating’ score, a Credit Provider will be provided with a number based on your credit habits – and this will be used to help calculate your credit worthiness. Whilst it is not disclosed by credit reporting agencies the specific items which lower your score and how much by, traditionally there are some things you can do to which will help keep your credit-worthiness in check. We look at good credit habits, and what things you need to do when our Privacy Laws change in March 2014:

    1. Pay on time, every time.

    Your repayment history information is being collected now. It is imperative you make repayments on accounts by their due date to avoid having late payment notations recorded on your credit file and shown after the March 2014 implementation.

    If you can’t pay on time, seek alternative arrangements with your lender – but be advised these new arrangements will be recorded on your credit file. This would always be preferable to a default listing though – especially if you can show good repayment history at those new terms – so there is a new incentive to get in and work it out with your lender prior to letting your accounts go into arrears and copping a default listing.

    2. Check your credit file regularly.

    Make a habit of checking your credit file regularly. You can do this for free annually through the Australia’s credit reporting agencies. There will be five new data sets of information available to Credit Providers who request a copy of your credit report. These will be:

    – repayment history information;

    – the date on which a credit account was opened;

    – the date on which a credit account was closed;

    – the type of credit account opened; – and the current limit of each open credit account.

    It is essential that you take responsibility for the accuracy of your credit file information and even more so when the above new sets of information becomes available to Credit Providers.

    3. Correct credit information which you believe is inaccurate, inconsistent or unfair.

    If there is anything on your credit report which you believe rings untrue, or shouldn’t be there, you have the right to request this information be rectified. You will need to contact your Credit Provider to alter this information. You should do this before the information has any bearing on a credit application you may make in the future. You may contact a credit repair company to assist you with this if the change is a significant one, or if you expect resistance to the request. After March 2014, if your Credit Provider disagrees with your request to correct your credit information, you can have your dispute noted on your credit file and this would be worthwhile requesting if you believe your listing shouldn’t be there.

    4. Take precautions when applying for credit.

    You may not realise, but the volume of credit you apply for and the type of credit you apply for can hinder any future credit application you may make. Whilst it is a great idea to research credit before applying – you should only ever make a credit application you have full intention of pursuing. Too many credit applications will mean you are refused credit. And from March 2014 this will be clearly displayed on your credit report. Likewise, if you apply for too many ‘high interest’ or ‘bad credit’ loans – you could be penalised with a lender if you apply for a mortgage – especially with a credit ‘scoring’ method which may shave points off your score through this type of credit application.

    5. Seek cautions credit limits.

    You may have a credit limit of $10,000 – but only have used a quarter of that. This may not be to your advantage. If you’re not using it, don’t have it is the general adage. If you take out a credit card or other line of credit, it’s probably not wise to opt for a lofty limit. You could try to get it closer to what you intend to use. A Credit Provider will only see the credit limit and not the actual amount you have utilised on that limit. As with credit applications, any credit ‘score’ may be reduced by credit limits which are too high.

    6. Make information security paramount.

    Understand how lucrative your personal information can be in the wrong hands, and take steps to keep abreast of how it can be at risk from things like identity theft. Identity theft can lead to the stealing of credit through the fraudsters accessing your credit file. Victims can end up with defaults on their credit file and a ban on obtaining credit for 5 years. The Office of the Information Commissioner (OAIC)’s factsheet Ten Steps To Protect Your Personal Information gives you some guidance on how to do that. New laws will allow you to place a ban period on your credit information if you believe you may be at risk of identity theft, which can prevent fraudsters from accessing credit in your name – so if you do feel you may be at risk – acting quickly may save your credit file from misuse.

    Image 1: Rawich/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net

    Banner: Courtesy of OAIC

     

     

  • Privacy Law reform – protecting your personal information and your credit file: Privacy Awareness Week 2013

    Identity theftIdentity theft is an ever-growing threat to Australians and the commodity which is traded, sought after and misused for criminal or financial gain by fraudsters is your personal information. In amendments to the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) which occurred late last year and which will be implemented in March 2014, there will be some improvements in Privacy Law to do with requirements on organisations to keep your personal information safe. As identity theft can also go so far as to impact on your credit file, there are also improvements suggested within the Draft Credit Reporting Code of Conduct, aimed at protecting you and your credit file against identity theft. We look at these changes and the impact they may have on you.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au

    PrivacyWeek-Banners-R1 - 2013-3

    Personal Information in the Australian Privacy Principles

    We look at the differences in the areas of requirements by organisations in regards to personal information collection and security of personal information, as provided by the OAIC, which are set out in new Australian Privacy Principles, set to replace the current National Privacy Principles.

    Security of Personal Information

    APP 11 requires an organisation to take reasonable steps to protect the personal information it holds from interference, in addition to misuse and loss, and unauthorised access, modification and disclosure (as required by NPP 4.1).

    APP 11.1 imposes the same obligation as [fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”][current] NPP 4 in relation to the protection of the personal information that an organisation holds. However, APP 11.1 now also requires organisations to protect personal information from interference.

    APP 11.2 introduces new exceptions to the requirement that an organisation take reasonable steps to destroy or de-identify personal information, once it is no longer needed for any purpose for which it may be used or disclosed in accordance with the APPs: – if it is not contained in a Commonwealth record (APP 11.2(c))[6], and – if the organisation is not required by or under an Australian law, or a court/tribunal order, to retain the information (APP 11.2(d)).[7]

    Sensitive information

    Summary of [current] NPP 10 An organisation must not collect an individual’s sensitive information unless a listed exception applies (NPP 10.1). Sensitive information is defined in s 6.

    NPP 10.2 and 10.3 set out specific exceptions regarding the collection of health information.

    Relevant APPs

    APP 3 – collection of solicited personal information

    Key differences

    APP 3 clarifies that an organisation must only collect sensitive information about an individual if the individual consents to the collection and the information is reasonably necessary for the organisation’s functions or activities, or an exception applies (APP 3.3).

    The definition of sensitive information in s 6 has been extended to include: -biometric information that is to be used for the purpose of automated biometric verification or biometric identification or biometric templates.[14]

    Sensitive information may also be collected about an individual: -if required or authorised by or under an Australian law or a court/tribunal order (APP 3.4(a))[15] when a permitted general situation or permitted health situation applies (APP 3.4(b)-(c), s 16A).

    Permitted general situations include the collection of sensitive information where: -the entity reasonably believes that the collection is necessary to lessen or prevent a serious threat to the life, health or safety of any individual or to public health or safety, and it is unreasonable or impracticable to obtain the individual’s consent to the collection (APP 3.4(b), permitted general situation 1 (s 16A item 1)).

    This exception reflects the wording of NPP 10.1(c), but removes the requirement that the threat must be imminent. This exception also replaces the specific circumstances set out in NPP 10.1(c) in which an individual may be unable to consent, with the more general ‘unreasonable or impracticable’.

    -the entity has reason to suspect that unlawful activity, or misconduct of a serious nature, that relates to the entity’s functions or activities has been, is being or may be engaged in, and the entity reasonably believes that the collection is necessary for the entity to take appropriate action in relation to the matter (APP 3.4(b), permitted general situation 2 (s 16A item 2)).

    This is a new exception in relation to the collection of sensitive information.

    the entity reasonably believes that the collection is reasonably necessary to assist any APP entity, body or person to locate a person who has been reported as missing (APP 3.4(b), permitted general situation 3 (s 16A item 3)).

    This is a new provision in relation to the collection of sensitive information.

    The permitted health situations replicate the wording of NPP 10.2 and NPP 10.3, in relation to the collection of health information for the provision of a health service and for research.

    APP 3.4(e) relates to non-profit organisations and replaces NPP 10.1(d). APP 3.4(e) permits the collection of an individual’s sensitive information by non-profit organisations where the information:

    relates to the activities of the organisation, and relates solely to the members of the organisation, or to individuals who have regular contact with the organisation in connection with its activities.

    The definition of ‘non-profit organisation’ is now included in s 6.[16] It states that a ‘non-profit organisation’ means an organisation that is a non-profit organisation, and engages in activities for cultural, recreational, political, religious, philosophical, professional, trade or trade union purposes. This definition replaces the terms ‘racial’ and ‘ethnic’ in the NPP 10.5 definition with the term ‘cultural’. In addition, it also includes in the definition organisations with a ‘recreational’ purpose.

    Identity theft and credit file protection

    The proposed new Credit Reporting Code of Conduct – currently in draft stage, has some significant new protections for victims of fraud.

    The draft code sets out the opportunity for individuals who believe they may be likely to be or have been a victim of fraud, to request a ban be placed on the use or disclosure of their credit reporting information without the individual’s consent. This is intended to combat identity theft which involves the stealing of credit through impersonating the victim and taking credit out in their name.

    Where a Credit Reporting Bureau (CRB) receives a request from a Credit Provider (CP) for credit reporting information about an individual in relation to whose credit reporting information a ban period is in effect, the CRB must inform the CP of the ban period and its effect.

    The Code also intends to give a CRB powers in these cases to seek information relevant to the individual’s fraud allegations from a CP who may have also been affected by the alleged fraud in order to both determine whether the individual has been a victim of fraud, and to decide the length of the ban period.

    Enhanced powers for the Privacy Commissioner

    Whilst we are yet to have mandatory data breach notification laws, which would require individuals to be notified by an entity which holds their information of a data breach (currently it is just encouraged that this occurs), there are some areas where the Privacy Commissioner’s powers will be strengthened.

    The Privacy Commissioner will have enhanced powers, in the areas of:

    • Ability to accept enforceable undertakings

    • Ability to seek civil penalties in the case of serious or repeated breaches of privacy

    • Ability to conduct assessments of privacy performance for both Australian government agencies and businesses.

    On 28 December 2012, section 4AA of the Crimes Act 1914 was amended to increase the amount of a penalty unit from $110 to $170.

    This means that, under the reforms to the Privacy Act due to commence on 12 March 2014, the maximum penalty amount for a serious or repeated interference with the privacy of an individual will be $340,000 for individuals and $1.7 million for entities.

    Identity theft test.

    As part of Privacy Awareness Week, you can take an online identity theft test, via the OAIC website to see how vulnerable you may be to identity theft. It examines 11 ways you could become a victim of identity theft and offers advice on ways to reduce your risk.

    Image: Salvatore Vuono/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net[/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

  • Information Security – Is Your Business Ready for Privacy Law Reform? Privacy Awareness Week 2013

    Do you have a plan to walk your business through privacy law reforms? The Office of the Information Commissioner (OAIC) recommends businesses and government agencies who have obligations under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) should start planning now for the implementation of privacy law reform in March 2014. We provide you with guidance and links to the many significant aspects governing new obligations and responsibilities as a business which handles the personal information of individuals to assist you with the changes coming your way next year.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    PrivacyWeek-Banners-R1 - 2013-3

    Currently, businesses covered by the Privacy Act are subject to the 10 National Privacy Principles (NPPs), while most Australian, ACT and Norfolk Island government agencies must comply with 11 Information Privacy Principles (IPPs). Under the new privacy law the IPPs and NPPs will be replaced by the new, unified, Australian Privacy Principles (APPs). This is just one of the many significant changes to the Privacy Act.

    The OAIC has outlined some questions you can ask yourself to see what your requirements may be within the new privacy laws:

    • Does your business or agency handle personal information? There are some changes to what constitutes personal information under the Privacy Act

    • Do you need to review your business or agency’s privacy policy? You should have an up-to-date policy that is reviewed regularly. The new laws set out some requirements for privacy policies

    • Do you need to review your business or agency’s outsourcing arrangements? You will need to do this particularly if you are sending personal information overseas.

    • Do you use direct marketing to reach your customers? If you do, you will need to provide an easy way for people to opt-out of receiving these communications. There are some new rules in the area of direct marketing.

    • Does your business or agency receive unsolicited personal information. There are some new rules on how to handle this information.  

    • Do your information security systems need to be reviewed and updated?

    We recommend you download the OAIC’s Guide to Information Security (PDF) – an essential document for any business or agency which establishes a requirement to protect the personal information of individuals.

    If you are directly handling personal information, see also below the OAIC’S privacy factsheet 7 on ‘Ten Steps to protect other people’s personal information’ below:

    Ten steps to protect other people’s personal information.

    The aim of this 10 step guide is to help your organisation or agency protect other people’s personal information.

    Personal information is defined in s 6 of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Privacy Act) and means information that identifies or could reasonably identify an individual. There are some obvious examples of personal information, such as a person’s name and address. Personal information can also include medical records, bank account details, photos, videos, and even information about what an individual likes, their opinions and where they work.

    The 10 step guide gives a snapshot of some of the privacy rights for individuals, and obligations that organisations and Australian, ACT and Norfolk Island Government agencies have under the Privacy Act.

    The OAIC website has more information for organisations and agencies. You can also call our Enquiries Line on 1300 363 992.

    1. Only collect information you need

    Make sure individuals know what personal information your organisation or agency collects and why. Also ensure that: each piece of information is necessary for any of the functions or activities of the organisation or agency, and the information is required in the circumstances. Sometimes, activities can be carried out without collecting personal information. This allows individuals to interact anonymously with your organisation or agency.

    2. Don’t collect personal information about an individual just because you think that information may come in handy later.

    Only collect information that is necessary at the time of collection, not because it may become necessary or useful at a later date. If you need it later, collect the information then.

    3. Tell people how you are going to handle the personal information you collect about them.

    Have a publicly available policy that tells people how you handle personal information. Also, when you collect personal information, always let people know why you need to collect the information, how you plan to use it, who you are going to give it to. Make sure they know your contact details and, if they want to, how they can get access to their personal information.

    4. Think about using personal information for a particular purpose.

    Generally, organisations should not use personal information for a secondary purpose unrelated to the main purpose for which they collected the information. Unless your organisation has consent from the individual concerned or authorisation under law, it should generally only use personal information if it is: related to the purpose your organisation collected it for, and within the reasonable expectations of the individual.

    Similarly, agencies must: only use personal information for a relevant purpose, and take reasonable steps to ensure that personal information is accurate, up to date and complete before using it.

    The OAIC website has more information on the obligations organisations and agencies have under the Privacy Act.

    5. Think before disclosing personal information

    The Privacy Act allows organisations and agencies to disclose personal information in some circumstances. Sometimes, organisations and agencies disclose personal information when they don’t need to, or without considering whether the disclosure is authorised under the Privacy Act. Always think about whether a purpose can be achieved without disclosing personal information. Good practice: Get consent from the individual if you want to disclose their personal information for a reason that is different from the reason you collected it.

    6. If people ask, give them access to the personal information you hold about them

    Organisations and agencies have a general duty to give individuals access to their personal information. Here are some things to consider: Be as open as possible by giving individuals access to their personal information in the form they request. If you deny access to personal information, give the reason — consistent with the Privacy Act — to the individual as soon as you can. An individual also has an alternative path when seeking information from an agency. If an individual seeks access under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 ((Cth)) (FOI Act), the agency is obliged to consider the request under the FOI Act rather than the Privacy Act. Access under the FOI Act may be subject to specific exemptions. This alternative applies only to agencies, not organisations. The OAIC website has more information for agencies regarding the FOI Act.

    7. Keep personal information secure

    It is important that you keep personal information safe and secure from unauthorised access, modification or disclosure and also against misuse and loss. How you do this depends on the sensitivity of the information you hold, and the circumstances of your organisation or agency. Methods could include: considering the adequacy of existing security measures and procedures, including whether any relevant standards are met training staff in privacy procedures ensuring adequate IT security, such as installing firewalls, cookie removers and anti-virus scanners on work IT systems checking that all personal information has been removed from electronic devices before you sell or destroy them keeping hard copy files in properly secured cabinets allowing staff to access personal information on a ‘need to know’ basis only regularly monitoring your information handling practices to ensure they are secure. Depending on the size of your organisation and the information it collects, it may be prudent to have an external privacy audit done.

    8. Don’t keep information you no longer need or that you no longer have to retain

    If you no longer need personal information and there is no law that says you have to retain the information, then destroy it. Shred, pulp or destroy the personal information paper records. Dispose of files in security bins. Delete electronic records or files securely so that they can’t be retrieved.

    9. Keep personal information accurate and up to date

    The accuracy and currency of personal information you hold can change. Your organisation or agency needs to take reasonable steps to keep the personal information it holds current. Amend your records to reflect changes and make sure both hard copy and electronic files are updated. If you know that some personal information is likely to change regularly, go through the files periodically to ensure that your records are accurate and up to date.

    10. Consider making someone in your organisation or agency responsible for privacy

    This could be a designated person (often called a Privacy Contact Officer or Chief Privacy Officer) who: knows your organisation or agency’s responsibilities under the Privacy Act, and is willing and able to handle complaints and enquiries about the personal information handling practices of your organisation or agency. This person could also be responsible for implementing a complaint handling process, staff training programs and promoting Privacy Act compliance.

    Don’t leave privacy to chance.

    In tomorrow’s Privacy Awareness Week 2013 post – we look at the Privacy Reforms aimed at protecting individuals, and their credit file from identity theft.

  • New laws to aid in correcting your credit report: Privacy Awareness Week 2013

    correcting credit reportsThere are a number of significant changes which will impact the correction of credit reports coming through once Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) amendments are implemented in March 2014. As part of Privacy Awareness Week 2013 and this week’s theme Privacy Law Reform, we thought it would be fitting as credit repairers to stipulate those changes that may benefit consumers in the area of disputing unfair or inconsistent credit listings. There is a whole host of new information available to Credit Providers, and with this there will be an increased obligation for Credit Providers to provide accurate, up-to-date and fair information. When correcting their credit report, obviously each consumer will need to draw on different aspects of Privacy Legislation when making their case to dispute their credit listing, and this is why full knowledge of all available privacy legislation both current and new is the key to disputing credit listings. But we look at the new Australian Privacy Principles, and how they are currently interpreted in the draft Credit Reporting Code  of Conduct when it comes to access and correction of credit information.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    PrivacyWeek-Banners-R1 - 2013-3

    Australian Privacy Principles

    The National Privacy Principles (NPP) has up till now been the legislation which underpins the access and correction of Australian credit reports. Come March 2014, this legislation will become the Australian Privacy Principles (APP). There have been some long awaited changes in the area of access and correction. Currently, NPP 6 covers both access and correction, and this will be split into two separate principles APP’s 12 (access) and 13 (correction) come March 2014.

    Access

    Access involves the request for individuals to access information a company holds about them, and it is an important part of Privacy legislation for credit repair. Having full access to your personal information allows you, for instance, to be privy to all the information a Credit Provider may hold about you and your account, including their client notes and their copies of documentation. To have this information is essential in order to go through and make your case for disputing a credit listing which you believe is inconsistent.

    APP 12.4 introduces a new requirement for organisations to respond to a request for access within a reasonable period, and in the manner requested by the individual, if it is reasonable and practicable to do so. This will be of great benefit to consumers, as it stipulates the requirement for timeliness when requesting information from Credit Providers. Many of our clients, and indeed individuals have experienced a significant delay in receiving, if not outright refusal to provide such information. To have a Credit Provider not provide this information can stop a case for dispute in its tracks.

    Correction

    Currently, if an individual is able to establish that their personal information is not accurate, complete and up-to-date, an organisation must take reasonable steps to correct the information (NPP 6.5). If the organisation and the individual disagree about the accuracy, completeness and currency of the information, the organisation must attach a statement to the information noting this, if the individual requests it to do so (NPP 6.6).

    Up till now, it has in many cases been difficult for individuals to establish that information is inaccurate, particularly when the Credit Provider disagrees with this claim. It has been up to the individual (or credit repairer) to go about proving the information is inconsistent.  Many individuals have no skill set for establishing proof of inaccuracy, as it requires extensive knowledge of legislation, as well the legal knowledge to negotiate with a very experienced Credit Provider.

    The Privacy Commissioner explains the finer points of new legislation to help consumers with correction in its reference material on the new Australian Privacy Principles (PDF):

    APP 13 amends the requirement in NPP 6.5 for an individual to establish that their personal information is not accurate, complete and up-to-date.

    Instead, if:

    an organisation is satisfied that, having regard to a purpose for which the information is held, the information is inaccurate, out-of-date, incomplete or irrelevant or misleading, or

    the individual to whom the personal information relates requests the organisation to correct the information

    the organisation must take reasonable steps to correct the personal information to ensure that, having regard to the purpose for which it is held, it is accurate, up-to-date, complete, relevant and not misleading.

    If an organisation corrects personal information about an individual that it has previously disclosed to another APP entity, the organisation must take reasonable steps to notify the other APP entity of the correction, where that notification is requested by the individual (APP 13.2).

    APP 13.3 requires an organisation to provide an individual with written notice if it refuses to correct the personal information as requested by the individual. The written notice must set out:

    the reason for refusal (unless this would be unreasonable)

    the mechanisms available to complain about the refusal, and

    any other matter prescribed by regulation.

    If an organisation refuses to make a correction, and an individual requests that a statement be attached to the record stating that the information is inaccurate, out-of-date, incomplete, irrelevant or misleading, the organisation generally needs to attach this statement in a way that will make the statement apparent to users of the information (APP 13.4).

    APP 13.5 introduces a new requirement for an organisation to respond to a correction request within a reasonable period. The organisation must not charge the individual for making the request, for correcting the information or for associating the statement with the personal information (APP 13.5).

    So in lay-man’s terms, it will be up to the Credit Provider, if it refuses to correct the personal information requested by an individual, to provide reasons as to why it has refused to correct the credit report, and to provide direction to the consumer about how to complain if necessary. On top of this, if the Credit Provider refuses to correct a credit report, individuals may be able to request that a statement be attached to their record showing that the information is considered by them to be inconsistent.

    Credit Reporting Code of Conduct

    Interpretation of APP’s will be set out in a new Credit Reporting Code of Conduct. Currently this document is in draft stage. There are many significant points for correcting credit reports right through this document, but in the particular area of access, correction and complaint we have these changes:

    Access

    Access to information will be

    -free every 12 months

    -free if it relates to a CP’s decision to refuse credit The CRB’s free credit report must be as easy to find as the paid report CRB is required to give a basic explanation to the info it provides to individual on their credit report.

    Correction

    Can occur whether a CRB or CP is satisfied information is inconsistent, inaccurate out of date etc. Must make correction within 30 days or longer as agreed in writing by individual CRB’s or CP’s consulted by another CRB or CP about a correction requests must be responded to promptly (recommended 10 days).

    Complaint

    Must be acknowledged within 7 days and investigated and where necessary consultation with CP’s or CRB’s may occur. A decision must be made in 30 days or longer as agreed by individual in writing.

    Integrity of Credit Reporting Information

    The other significant change is in the area of auditing Credit Providers. We believe this could bring about significant positive changes within the credit reporting system. Credit reporting agencies (CRB’s) will now have the task of providing reports to the public and also to the Privacy Commissioner (who will have final say on complaints and even new powers to penalise breaches) on complaints and corrections numbers.

    CRB’s will need to publish information on the number of correction requests received, the number of corrections successful and the number of complaints by each CP. This is with the aim to maintain the integrity of credit reporting information, and to promote accountability through providing transparency in relation to corrections requests and complaints. It will tip the scales in what has often been a case of David and Goliath. Audits will we hope identify those companies who experience problems with credit reporting that could disadvantage consumers, and force some companies to undertake reasonable steps to rectify identified issues.

    In Privacy Awareness Week tomorrow, we look at the area of Data Security and how that may impact your business…

    image: digitalart/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net

  • Your credit check is soon to reveal all your bad habits: Privacy Awareness Week 2013.

    repayment history informationPress Release

    Your credit check is soon to reveal all your bad habits: Privacy Awareness Week 2013.

    29 April 2013

    Australians are urged to be more diligent with paying all of their bills on time, every time or face a black mark against their name as part of privacy law reforms on their way in March 2014 – and a consumer advocate for accurate credit reporting warns consumers that late payment information is being collected now.

    CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair, Graham Doessel says it is important for all credit active individuals to rethink their repayment habits, or potentially face a series of late payment notations which could mean they are banned from credit in the future.

    “The time to change is now. Ensure that every bill is being paid on time – not two days late, or a week late – as come March next year – our history of paying bills late from December 2012 onward will show up when we apply for credit,” Mr Doessel warns.

    His warning comes as part of Australia’s Privacy Awareness Week 2013 which is run from 29 April to 4 May, aimed at educating individuals and businesses on matters of privacy. 2013’s theme is Privacy Law Reform – a campaign to educate Australians about changes to the Privacy Act (1988) passed on November 29 2012, which will be implemented on March 12, 2014.

    Repayment history information (RHI) is part of five new data sets which will appear on Australian credit reports, from March next year – meant to afford a more accurate picture of someone’s suitability to service a loan.

    The other four data sets are: the date on which a credit account was opened; the date on which a credit account was closed; the type of credit account opened; and the current limit of each open credit account.

    “I think late payments will be looked on pretty unfavourably when this information becomes available to lenders, along with other factors such as applying for too much credit; applying for credit too often; or applying for the ‘wrong’ type of credit,” Mr Doessel says.

    He says it is not known how much weight repayment history will be afforded on its own, but predicts lenders will be reluctant to lend to someone who presents with too many late payments – even if there are no defaults present.

    “If lenders are deciding between an application which has no late payments and one with a few scattered here and there, they’d probably choose the clear one,” he says.

    Mr Doessel says when the legislation was passed in late November, many – including himself were up in arms that RHI could be included after an account was one day late.

    “This didn’t allow for any wiggle room, and put those using systems like direct debits and BPay at risk if payments didn’t go through right on time,” he says.

    But a draft Credit Reporting Code of Conduct which will underpin the changes to the Privacy Act now allows for a 5 day grace period before RHI is recorded.

    “I am thankful that those drafting the CR Code have taken these concerns into consideration and adopted the 5 day rule for individuals – making it fairer for all,” he says.

    Mr Doessel says come March 2014, it will be more important than ever for individuals to be vigilant with checking their credit file.

    “With all the new information about people available to lenders, it is pretty crucial that it reads accurately. You can check your credit file at no charge annually by applying with Australia’s credit reporting agencies,” he says.

    Go to http://bit.ly/My-Free-Credit-File for more help to obtain your credit report.

    “Thankfully, if there are issues of inaccuracy on credit reports from March – there will be more support within the Privacy Act amendments to allow for ease of correction,” Mr Doessel says.

    PrivacyWeek-Banners-R1 - 2013-3

    /ENDS.

    Please contact:

    Graham Doessel – CEO Ph 3124 7133

    Lisa Brewster – Media Relations media@mycra.com.au

    Ph 07 3124 7133 www.mycra.com.au www.mycra.com.au/blog

    MyCRA Credit Repair 246 Stafford Rd, STAFFORD Qld

    MyCRA is Australia’s number one in credit rating repairs. We permanently remove defaults from credit files. CEO of MyCRA Graham Doessel is a frequent consumer spokesperson for credit reporting issues and is a founding member of the Credit Repair Industry Association of Australasia.

    Top image: FrameAngel/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net

  • Identities at risk in the Australia Post system

    Identity theftIn the news this week it was revealed that Australia Post customers have been exposed to identity theft. On Monday a Sydney Postal Centre worker was found guilty on four charges of mail theft. The worker was caught stealing credit cards and other sensitive information for criminal contacts. Investigators are unable to say how many people’s confidential details had been compromised, having only recovered four letters. We feature this story in full from news.com.au, and look deeper at identity theft, what criminals have to gain from it, and how you and your credit file may be at risk.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    An Australian Government survey on identity theft, released in June 2011 by then Attorney-General Robert McLelland, revealed 1 in 6 Australians have been a victim or know someone who has been a victim of identity theft. Identity theft can happen to anyone, and it seems even if you have no Facebook account, only a minimal online presence, answer no scam phone calls and don’t unnecessarily reveal your personal information, you can still be at risk, just by your mail being compromised.

    This recent news story illustrates how easily this can occur:

    Australia Post customers at risk of identity theft after sorter stole credit cards for criminal contacts

    AUSTRALIA Post customers have been left exposed to potential scams and identity theft after a worker at a Sydney postal centre was caught stealing credit cards and other sensitive information for criminal contacts.

    Investigators are unable to say how many people’s confidential details disgraced night sorter Morris John Lilio compromised, with only four letters he lifted recovered.

    The 60-year-old had been working at the Waterloo facility since 2008 when he was nabbed on camera sneaking out eastern suburbs residents’ mail in August.

    CCTV footage of his early-morning shifts revealed him repeatedly looking around the facility before slipping mail into his jacket sleeves and leaving the building for his morning break.

    On the day he was arrested police seized several letters – one of which had a credit card inside it – all addressed to one Woollahra household hidden in a Gregory’s street directory inside a colleague’s parked car.

    Detectives also found a series of text messages on Lilio’s two mobile phones, including some from earlier in the morning when officers swooped on the thief.

    “If you ever want the guy’s signature he can get that also,” one message said, listing a man’s birthdate and phone number. “He said if he could get two really good GE (Money) or GO. Also can you please look out for tax return cheques.”

    In an earlier message Lilio wrote: “That’s all I could get this morning. 2 and u got both. But send one of girls 2 pick up.”

    “No good, reported stolen,” he was messaged back.

    Lilio told police that people had asked him to do “things I don’t want to do” after he got involved with drugs, but he denied acting on their demands for stolen mail.

    He later claimed in court that any letters seen in his jacket got there by mistake when he was putting it on for his break. But in Central Local Court last week, magistrate Mark Buscombe said Lilio’s explanation that letters had repeatedly got stuck in his clothes accidentally was “fanciful”.

    He found Lilio guilty on four charges of mail theft, adding the former Australia Post worker had told police a series of lies and the text messages clearly showed he had been stealing mail for others based on the details they sent him.

    Police admitted the bulk of the mail Lilio stole was never found and it was not known who he had passed the confidential material to.

    Australia Post spokeswoman Melanie Ward said the organisation had a “zero-tolerance” to mail-security breaches and any workers implicated were immediately sacked, although she would not say what screening processes Australia Post had in place for its staff.

    Lilio is scheduled to be sentenced next month.

    Organised crime and Identity theft

    The typical identity theft victim is an ordinary person, who just happens to have fallen prey to the vast criminal network which exists on the internet or elsewhere.

    A leading commentator on technology issues, Stilgherrian warned people of the intricacies of identity theft in the modern age in his article ‘The real cyber criminals are no lolling matter:

    “First, these crimes are committed on a vast scale. Criminal processes are orchestrated globally, automated, and supported by thousands of unwitting, disposable minions. If only a tiny percentage of people fall for scams, we’re still talking millions of dollars.

    Second, the bad guys are good at this. Really good. Blaming the victims is inappropriate. “They had it coming to them”? Really? Third, it all connects up. Fifty bucks went missing from your credit card precisely because the number had been stolen from a poorly-secured online store. The legitimate website popped up the message from the fake anti-virus product because it, too, was poorly secured and had been hacked automatically by software that probed a hundred thousand websites one night.

    Or, in the case of identity theft, when someone takes out $50,000 of loans in your name? That happens through the gradual accumulation of personal data. Your name and email address from a list stolen from a hacked website, cross-matched with your street address from another, your date of birth from a third, and so on.

    These databases can contain millions of people’s details. They’re traded in shady online markets where people buy the pieces missing from the databases they already have, merge them, refine them, mark ‘em up and sell ‘em on until eventually there’s enough to turn it all into a credit application. It’s then laundered though “money mules”, people recruited in the belief they’re making money at home with just a computer.”

    The story of this vast, global ecology of crime is both fascinating and real. So why isn’t it told?

    Well, it’s a hard story to tell. Everything’s new and different. Imagine trying to tell the story a bank hold-up if you had to first explain all the pieces as if they were brand new. Bank. Money. Gun, Trigger. Balaclava, “OK, everybody lie down on the floor and keep calm.” Getaway car.

    Global organised crime is a complex octopus. By the time you’ve explained the first sucker at the end of tentacle number one you’re up to the next ad break and everyone’s lost attention.

    The Australian Crime Commission’s CEO, John Lawler revealed at a national conference for credit professionals in September that identity crime is a “key facilitator” for organised crime groups because it is an anonymous crime which can enable significant fraud.

    “Every single person in this room and the various sectors and organisations that you represent are targets for organised crime,” he told the Conference.

    “Criminals will exploit technology to not only carry out new crimes but commit traditional crimes on a much larger scale.”

    The ACC estimates organised crime is currently costing the Australian economy at least $15 billion per annum – and that the impacts of this are significant and growing.

    Mr Lawler says the amount of personal information requested and stored online, along with the growing popularity of social networking sites, provides organised crime with a larger pool of victims and data to harvest.

     “Organised criminals seek to conduct significant research on their intended victims and tailoring their operations to target weaknesses,” he says.

    So whilst this Aussie postal worker has been caught out and that is indeed terrible – we need to take a step back and look at the bigger picture. Look at the machine he was feeding this information to. That’s the big issue. The real problem here. They can probably find many people like him to do what he did. There are probably many people willing to go through somebody’s rubbish bin for a few bucks, to steal mail out of letterboxes, to make some shady phone calls to get personal information, even to write up computer programs and online scams to trick people. Some of these fraudsters probably have no idea that they are potentially contributing to not just theft, but in the wrong hands full-blown identity theft at some point – where not only money is stolen, but credit and therefore a person’s good credit rating.

    A life turned upside down

    Recovering from identity fraud is never an easy task – and it can be fraud to the tune of a mere $300 which is as devastating to a victim’s ability to obtain credit in the future, as fraud of $300,000.  Creditors need proof the victim didn’t initiate the credit. But many people don’t know how the fraud eventuated, and even if they do there’s no guarantee they can recover their good credit rating – meaning they can be locked out of credit for the duration of the credit listing, which in the case of a default, is 5 years. Not to mention if there is a hefty debt to pay they are not responsible for.

    Early intervention is critical

    If you have ever had any type of scam or crime committed against you, the message is – be wary of what the real ramifications of that fraud could be, and take action to protect your credit file as well as your finances. Check your bank and credit card statements thoroughly – any suspect signs could mean you are at risk of identity theft. You should also order a copy of your credit report – which would indicate if your credit file has been misused or attempts have been made to obtain credit in your name.

    Contact Police immediately and also alert your Creditors and the Credit Reporting Agencies which hold your credit file if you are at all suspicious of identity theft before it leads to fraud.

    Image: nuttakit/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net

  • Churning – who says it’s bad?

    Press Release

    churningChurning – who says it’s bad?

    12 April 2013

    Churning for self interest is without question a highly unethical practice for a broker to perform, but a consumer advocate says when it comes to expensive credit, there can be such a thing as an ethical churn.

    CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair, Graham Doessel says for clients who are currently sitting in a high interest loan, there are potentially tens of thousands of dollars which can be saved by their broker turning their loan over to mainstream credit, and he says it can happen easier than many brokers think.

    “It is often thought that if a client has bad credit, it is meant to be there, when in reality mistakes are extremely prevalent in credit reporting but it has in the past been difficult for individuals to make a case to dispute their credit listing,” Mr Doessel says.

    Traditionally clients with bad credit are steered by brokers towards the non-conforming loan market – but Mr Doessel argues they should first be given the right to have their credit listings assessed for compliance with current law.

    “A professional credit repairer will conduct an audit-like investigation on the client’s credit file – and in most cases there are compliance issues or out and out mistakes which can see the listing proven unlawful and be required to be removed from the credit file,” he says.

    He says this practice has seen his clients save thousands of dollars just in interest alone on a home loan.

    Comparison Table $400,000 loan over 30 years

    Repayment time frame Min. repayment on interest rate 10.5% Min. repayment on interest rate 6% Difference in interest paid.
    Monthly $ 3,658.96 $ 2,398.20 $ 1,260.76 
    Weekly $ 843.97 $ 553.05 $ 290.92 
    Yearly  $43,907.52 $28,778.40 $15,129.12

    Over an average three-year period in a non-conforming home loan a client with a $400,000 loan could be paying over $45,000 extra in interest.

    Mr Doessel says in these instances it is not only ethical for brokers to churn their clients, but they almost have an obligation to do so.

    “When we consider these figures, brokers are almost ethically obligated to ensure that no clients are paying this extra interest unnecessarily – which could involve going back through client databases and uncovering some of the basic circumstances surrounding the bad credit, or even more basically – by sending bad credit clients for a credit repair assessment.”

    “In the past we’ve found clients who are given that option to save themselves so much money are pretty grateful, they’re more likely to give brokers repeat business or to refer – and the advantage to using a broker becomes really evident to them,” Mr Doessel says.

    /ENDS.

    Please contact:

    Graham Doessel – CEO Ph 3124 7133

    Lisa Brewster – Media Relations media@mycra.com.au

    Ph 07 3124 7133 www.mycra.com.au www.mycra.com.au/blog

    MyCRA Credit Repair 246 Stafford Rd, STAFFORD Qld

    MyCRA is Australia’s number one in credit rating repairs. We permanently remove defaults from credit files. CEO of MyCRA Graham Doessel is a frequent consumer spokesperson for credit reporting issues and is a founding member of the Credit Repair Industry Association of Australasia.

    Image: suphakit73/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net

  • Cybercrime goes all the way to RBA but do our laws protect us?

    [fusion_builder_container type=”flex” hundred_percent=”no” equal_height_columns=”no” menu_anchor=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” background_color=”” background_image=”” background_position=”center center” background_repeat=”no-repeat” fade=”no” background_parallax=”none” parallax_speed=”0.3″ video_mp4=”” video_webm=”” video_ogv=”” video_url=”” video_aspect_ratio=”16:9″ video_loop=”yes” video_mute=”yes” overlay_color=”” video_preview_image=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” padding_top=”” padding_bottom=”” padding_left=”” padding_right=””][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ layout=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” border_position=”all” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding_top=”” padding_right=”” padding_bottom=”” padding_left=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” center_content=”no” last=”true” min_height=”” hover_type=”none” link=”” border_sizes_top=”” border_sizes_bottom=”” border_sizes_left=”” border_sizes_right=”” first=”true”][fusion_separator style_type=”default” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” sticky_display=”normal,sticky” class=”” id=”” flex_grow=”0″ top_margin=”” bottom_margin=”” width=”” alignment=”center” border_size=”” sep_color=”” icon=”” icon_size=”” icon_color=”” icon_circle=”” icon_circle_color=”” /][fusion_text]

    data breach notificationIt seems no Australian business is immune to cyber-attack, including the Reserve Bank of Australia which it was recently revealed has been hacked. A prominent cyber security specialist says cover ups happen all the time and that we must push for mandatory data breach notification laws to protect against the threat of identity theft and subsequent credit fraud. We look at the reality of these cyber-attacks, and the position SME’s find themselves in moving forward in issues of privacy.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    How real is the threat of a major cyber-attack leading to mass money loss and credit fraud, or even cyber terrorism on our shores? As a recent story in the Australian Financial Review titled Attacks ‘highlight need for data breach notification law’ reveals, pretty real and it seems our lack of mandatory data breach notification laws is not only down-playing the threats Australians face, but could be helping these criminals.

    “Not a day goes by when someone is not attempting to hack into any of the banks around Australia.”

    This was a statement made by the outgoing technology chief of the National Australia Bank, Gavin Slater at a recent talk to investors.

    He also revealed that just a few weeks ago:

    “11 United States banks were targeted by terrorist organisations in response to something that happened in the Middle East.”

    So if our banks are constant targets, why aren’t we informed?

    It was recently uncovered that the Reserve Bank of Australia’s systems had been compromised by China-based hackers. In response, technology security experts, including the former head of investigations at the Federal Police’s Australian High Tech Crime Centre, Nigel Phair called for the passing of long planned mandatory data breach notification laws.

    Mr Phair, who is now Director of the Centre for Internet Safety at the University of Canberra says the breach highlights the need for these laws to be passed.

    “The RBA story was hugely important, because the attack happened some time ago, and we only found out about it because of a freedom of information request,” Mr Phair said.

    “We desperately need data breach legislation; we are quite behind in ­global terms on that, to force businesses to disclose when sensitive data is breached. I don’t know what is holding it up, and I would like to think it is achievable. It will help other government agencies and businesses, to be aware that it is not just them being ­targeted, that the threats are pretty wide ranging,” he told the Fin Review.

    Mr Phair said many businesses wanted to avoid bad publicity and that it was understandable they would try to keep news of the loss of any intellectual property and customer details quiet. He said for listed companies, the fear that investors would be spooked was a big factor. But he said the current code of silence was only making it easier for cyber criminals.

    The Fin Review revealed these statistics on data breaches:

    KPMG estimates that 75 per cent of the 1000 largest Australian companies have had a material data breach, reported to cost Australian companies an estimated $2.16 million per company per year, according to a 2011 study by the Ponemon Institute. The Australian Bankers Association has defended the strength of IT security processes in Australia’s banking system.

    ABA chief executive Steven Münchenberg recently told The Australian Financial Review that there were no reports of similar attacks on other local banks, and that effective processes were already in place to co-ordinate fraud investigations with federal and state police.

    “The Australian Bankers Association is not aware of any successful ­hacking attempts on Australian banks,” Mr Münchenberg said. “Banks have systems in place to protect customer information and accounts – such as employee training, employee accountability, strict privacy policies, rigorous security standards, encryption and fraud detection software.”

    “The nature of these discussions needs to remain confidential as any details may be misused by criminals,” Mr Münchenberg said.

    But Mr Phair elaborates in the Fin Review how easily cyber-attacks play out in business situations:

    Mr Phair warned that a significant number of Australian businesses and government agencies were ill-prepared for the kind of social engineering attacks which penetrated the RBA. In the attack it just required internal staff to be tricked into clicking on a fake email purporting to be from management.

    “Lots of organisations like the RBA have great perimeter and other security mechanisms in place, but this was basically just a phishing, social engineering attack. If I was a decent cyber criminal, that is what I would be doing,” he said.

    “People are the most susceptible and the weakest link, so you target them with what looks like a bona fide email, with an executable file in an attachment, and that is how you gain a weakness.”

     Mr Phair said the RBA’s subsequent claims that the attacks had been contained and that no sensitive information had been stolen were largely a public relations move to calm fears in the market.

    He said it was not really possible to tell exactly what people do once they have had access to networks.

     He also believed the problem was much wider spread than is ever reported, because a large number of hacking victims remain ignorant of the fact.

    “The RBA was right to come out with its public response.

    “The average person out there reading your pages would like to know that the RBA is protected,” Mr Phair said.

    Last October, the federal government was considering requiring companies to notify customers and the public of serious data breaches. However, the Fin Review reports it is over four years since a similar recommendation was made by the Australian Law Reform Commission.

    The then attorney-general, Nicola Roxon, published a discussion paper on potential implementation of plans, which could require companies and public-sector agencies to notify the Office of the Australian Privacy ­Commissioner when names, addresses and financial data are leaked or obtained by someone else.

    A spokeswoman for Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus said there were voluntary guidelines on how Australian companies and organisations should report a security breach, but increasing risks meant tougher laws could be on the way.

    “The Attorney-General is considering proposals that would require companies to report to consumers and the Commonwealth Privacy Commissioner when a data breach occurs, to improve privacy, bolster the security culture within organisations and bring Australia into line with international jurisdictions.”

    SME’s and Data breach notification.

    data breach notification SME'sData breach notification is a complicated issue. Yes, by sharing how threats have occurred we could be inviting copy-cat attacks. But Australians need to be made aware of what could threaten them.

    There has been much criticism after past data breaches such as the well-publicised Sony data breach, that companies who have in the past “held out” on their customers following a data breach, waiting days or up to a week or so to notify customers were putting the consumer’s personal information may be at risk.

    And rightly so. During the time, of ‘silence’ it can be argued that hackers have free access to this personal information without the consumer being able to do anything to minimise their own risk, such as cancelling accounts, changing passwords and flagging their credit accounts and credit file.

    For small to medium businesses, we need to make plans and take precautions to prevent future attacks and protect our consumers – and without the requirement out there to disclose data breaches SME’s are missing a big opportunity to be guided by the example of big business in how to handle (or not to handle) cyber-attack.

    That wider issue is what Australian SME’s face today – we are in the firing line for cyber-attacks simply by having a website, and staff with email addresses – but we rarely have the same security capabilities, the same profit margin and in many cases the same ‘publicity’ power that large entities would have. I can’t help imagining that as data breach laws begin to be enhanced, that SME’s could become the section of business most concerned with privacy issues, and the application of privacy law and indeed lawsuits against SME’s could be just as big a threat as the data breaches themselves.

    That is another reason why big business needs to set the example. Until the law requires them to do so, it would be ideal for them to voluntarily disclose data breaches as they  occur, with a view to educating the whole community on the nature of cyber-attack, and showing examples of the correct process for both preventing occurrences and dealing with them when they happen.

    Currently, the best place to go for up to date information on cyber-security and your rights and obligations is the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC). The OAIC’s article A Guide To Handling Personal Information Security Breaches is really essential reading for SME’s and includes information on obligations under the Privacy Act 1988, and advice on both handling a data breach, and preventing future data breaches in your company.

    As consumers.

    If you suspect your credit accounts may have been affected by identity theft – either through a cyber-attack or any form of credit fraud, you should do three things:

    1. Contact Police to report it.

    2. Notify your banks and Creditors.

    3. Notify the credit reporting agencies which hold your credit file.

    Act quickly. The faster you are able to take these actions the better you will be able to protect your credit file from impairment.  Catching identity theft early could prevent defaults and other credit listings.T

    This is why mandatory data breach notification is so important from the perspective of the consumer. Recovering your clean credit file following identity theft which has led to credit fraud can be difficult for individuals to do, as you have to prove you didn’t initiate the credit in your name.

    For further help or advice contact a MyCRA Credit Repair Advisor on 1300 667 218.

    Image 1: renjith krishnan/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net

    Image 2: AscensionDigital/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net

    [/fusion_text][/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

  • Consumers need credit reporting advocates: Credit repairer places in top 10% of companies in Start-Up Smart Awards 2013.

    badge_top50 Start-Up Smart Awards 2013Press Release

    Consumers need credit reporting advocates: Credit repairer places in top 10% of companies in Start-Up Smart Awards 2013.

    27 March 2012

    Credit rating repairer MyCRA has been placed at number 35 in the Australian Start-Up Smart Awards 2013, demonstrating the demand for skilled consumer advocates in the credit reporting arena.

    MyCRA Credit Rating Repair has been operating since 2009, and entrepreneur Graham Doessel – once Australia’s most successful non-conforming broker has been at the forefront of the emerging Australian credit repair industry, which he says has been born out of necessity.

    “The Global Financial Crisis has had a big impact on lending criteria, so all of a sudden it has become vitally important for Australians to have clean credit history in order to obtain approval for finance,” Mr Doessel explains.

    He says most people don’t know mistakes with credit history can and do happen, until it happens to them.

    “Most consumers have very little knowledge of credit reporting. They assume the system works, but they don’t understand that the responsibility for accuracy rests with them. Many times they apply for finance and are knocked back because of defaults or other listings they just didn’t know existed,” he says.

    There are four credit reporting agencies in Australia, and three in New Zealand, with Veda Advantage holding the majority of these credit files – with a total of over 16.5 million credit files in Australia alone. [fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”][i]

    Of these millions of credit files, it is not known how many contain negative listings, but some reports claim around 3 million in Australia.

    Those credit files are impacted for a period of 5 to 7 years, and affected people are generally refused credit in this time.

    “We work with those people who feel their bad credit is unfair, innacurate or inconsistent, and we go about proving that, so that unlawful listings are removed from consumer credit files,” Mr Doessel says.

    MyCRA conducts an audit-like investigation on behalf of the consumer, in order to uncover where a listing may have been placed unlawfully on the client’s credit file, and formulates a case based on legislation for requesting the listing’s removal by the Credit Provider.

    “Credit reporting is governed by strict legislation, legislation which most consumers have limited knowledge of, and often very little time to get to know. We bridge that gap,” Mr Doessel explains.

    Mr Doessel says MyCRA has been so warmly received because of the speed of listing removal, and their published success rate of up to 91.7% and he says this is down to the skill and experience of the team, which includes in-house solicitors and specialist compliance officers for each industry.

    “We have a large dedicated team, and our blue-print for success ensures that the overwhelming majority of people we take on are likely to have their inaccurate credit listing removed,” he explains.

    For the future, Mr Doessel is hoping MyCRA can continue to increase their success level and close the gap even further on their current default removal rate. He also wants to continue MyCRA’s strong history of speaking out for consumers in all matters of credit reporting.

    “Consumers will continue to need a voice, especially as new credit reporting laws emerge over the next 12 months,” he says.

    /ENDS.

    Please contact:

    Lisa Brewster – Media Relations MyCRA media@mycra.com.au

    http://www.mycra.com.au/ www.mycra.com.au.blog

    MyCRA Credit Repair 246 Stafford Rd, STAFFORD Qld

    MyCRA Credit Rating Repair is Australia’s leader in credit rating repairs. We permanently remove defaults from credit files. CEO of MyCRA Graham Doessel is a frequent consumer spokesperson for credit reporting issues and is a founding member of the Credit Repair Industry Association of Australasia.

    ——————————————————————————–

    [i] http://www.mycreditfile.com.au/about/ Veda holds the country’s largest database of credit files for more than 16.5 million credit-active Australians.

     [/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

  • W.A. real estate agent criticises measures to combat property scams

    W.A. property scamsLast year it was revealed that some properties in Western Australia had been sold out from under their overseas owners by fraudsters. Consumers, government and agents were so horrified they acted quickly to introduce new laws to protect the identity of property owners and prevent any more cases of property scams in the state. But the new identity requirements to combat the property scams have come under fire from a Perth real estate agent, who says the storage of personal data could be opening up further potential for identity theft. We look at the criticism from the Perth agent, and what we might be able to expect in the future in every state in terms of identity identification and the protection of both mortgage and the clear credit file of property owners across the country.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    In W.A. today late last week, RE/MAX WA Managing Director, Geoff Baldwin came out in criticism of the State’s identification check legislation instigated following Perth’s property scams.

    He called the legislation “a debacle, unnecessarily inconveniencing sellers and causing confusion and in some cases anger,” he was quoted in W.A. Today.

    He said the Code of Conduct required “due skill, care and diligence” to properly identify sellers before a sale goes through, and that this meant that during a 100-point identification check, real estate agents were keeping personal documents in order to demonstrate the fulfilment of this requirement.

    “It upsets a lot of sellers who, in these days of identity theft, rightfully feel uncomfortable with having copies of their passports, licences, etc sitting in manila folders in offices across Perth which is now the requirement for agents to comply with their yearly audits,” he said.

    “There is no argument that an ID system is required to make it as hard as possible for fraudsters to succeed but the current misinformation, doubling up, copying and storing of peoples personal information in agents’ offices is madness and has the capacity to replace one security problem with another.

    Mr Baldwin suggested an alternative method of identification which he hoped would be more secure for sellers.

    “The government needs to act now to refine the one system whereby prospective sellers attend the post office once, provides the required identification which is registered online as having been cleared,” he said.

    “This ID clearance should be associated with the particular property and the secure database should be accessible using a PIN, to agents, brokers, and settlement agents for their clients only.

    But his suggestions were rebuffed by director of property industries at Consumer Protection, Stephen Meagher.

    “The public are asked to provide ID when opening bank accounts, phone accounts etc and accept that to protect their interests in property that ID checks are required when selling their home.

    “Sellers may not always be within easy reach of an Australia Post outlet – either remote in Australia or overseas. “There would be fee for service implications in the Australia Post proposal.”

    WA Property Scams explained.

    In 2010, Wembley Downs retiree Roger Mildenhall had his Karrinyup investment property sold without knowing anything about it. And in 2012 Nigerian-based scammers sold a Ballajura property without the owners’ knowledge.

    “A couple returning from overseas have advised authorities that their property has been sold without their knowledge or consent and a joint investigation has been launched.

    The previous owners were living and working overseas at the time and didn’t discover the property had been sold until they recently returned to Perth to inspect the property.

    The real estate agent involved has told investigators that he received a phone call from a man claiming to be the owner in February this year inquiring about the property. Shortly after, the agent received an urgent request to sell the property as funds were needed for a business investment, later revealed to be a supposed petro-chemical project,” Landgate announced in a statement.

    With the scale of the scam, it is understandable that Government and Agent groups would have acted swiftly to try to combat any further instances of fraud. But Baldwin probably has a legitimate argument when we look at the methods that have been taken to combat it – considering how valuable personal information has become. He, like many others, have reservations regarding the amount of personal information which must be stored by different entities, and the likelihood that that personal information could fall into the wrong hands – like an identity thief’s. It is ironic that the protections we have instigated to combat identity theft seem to put us at greater risk of it. We’re damned if we do, and we’re damned if we don’t.

    Perhaps the answer is some kind of centrally stored database for identity checks – or maybe the old-fashioned paper storage is safer in this age of rising cyber-crime.

    Personal information and your credit file

    Fraudsters now see personal information as a valuable commodity. Many are able to use that information to take out credit in the victim’s name. Often the victim is not alerted to the misuse of their credit file for some time, often not until they attempt to obtain credit themselves. By then, victims may have credit applications as a minimum and possibly defaults, mortgages and mobile phones attributed to them incorrectly.

    Once any account remains unpaid past 60 days, the debt may be listed by the creditor as a default on a person’s credit file. Under current Australian legislation, defaults remain listed on the victim’s credit file for a 5 year period.

    If a victim has defaults on their credit file following identity theft – the defaults still remain there for 5 years. The onus is then on the identity theft victim to prove to creditors they didn’t initiate the debts in their name. If they are unable to prove this, they are virtually blacklisted from obtaining further credit themselves for 5 years.

    It is important for everyone to think twice about who they allow to have access to their personal information, and to verify all transactions are legitimate before handing over their details or any money.

    For more information on identity theft and your credit file, visit the MyCRA website www.mycra.com.au.

    Image: digitalart/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net

     

  • How To Spot the Difference Between Needs and Wants

    wants and needsIn our “Make Credit Work For You” post this week, we have a great article from Savingsguide Australia. Just subscribing to this blog alone will give you some invaluable tips you can use to help you rise to greatness with your finance goals. The article today is “How To Spot the Difference Between Needs and Wants.” If you have decided to live a life of frugality and perhaps have heard of the concept of Affluenza (when too much is never enough), then you will know a bit about the distinction of wants and needs. We may need to eat, but we might only want the big screen TV. Making the decision which is which is an ongoing battle. Thinking wants are needs causes many of us to buy more than we can afford, and we find ourselves struggling to pay back credit. Too many runs of this, and we end up defaulting on our repayments and a Credit Provider somewhere penalises us with bad credit that takes 5 years to shake off. Education and awareness is the key to changing this kind of behaviour – which is natural in all of us. So have a read of this article, and hopefully it helps you spot the difference.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    How To Spot the Difference Between Needs and Wants

    By Fran Sidoti

    I’m always the worst when it comes to thinking of how many needs I have. I need an expensive haircut. I need clothes with a more expensive price tag. I need, need, need. Life becomes a much simpler business when I realise that, in fact, these are wants, not needs and they are not essential to my well-being.

     What do I need? Enough food to not feel hungry, a warm place to sleep at night, a couple of goals to chase and people who love me to surround myself. Beyond those things, I probably don’t need much.

    This new Zen me is a little bit inspired by Adam Baker’s guest post on Get Rich Slowly, discussing his wants and needs. Returning from their nomadic lifestyle, Baker and his wife decided to look for a rental with three bedrooms, not the absolutely necessary two bedrooms, so Baker would have a space to work.

    The house they eventually settled on had flaws, but Baker suggests that by concentrating on the fact that three bedrooms was, in itself, a luxury, the flaws of the house tended to lose their importance.

    So, how can we start to fulfill our needs and appreciate our wants for what they are?

     Write it down  

    The best way to understand your own psyche is, sometimes, to write it all down. Construct two tables and write down your needs and your wants. Have a look at the list. Are there things that are under ‘needs’ and are really more things you want? Write down the list again, this time with a bit more self-reflection, and see what that reveals.  

    Ask yourself if you really need this  

    Before you buy anything, repeat the shopaholics’ mantra- do I need this? You’ll end up saving a lot of money that you might otherwise spend on unnecessary purchases. Sometimes it turns out you neither need it or, deep down, want it all that much. So many of my purchases are due to boredom or a mild inclination. Don’t buy things you’ll never really wear or use. Save the purchases for something you’ll really love.  

    Fund your needs  

    Ever spent all your money on entertainment, only to discover you’re short on rent, bills and will be reduced to eating baked beans for a fortnight? Fund your needs first, then fund your savings, and then spend some money on your wants, You might think that constant partying is the thing that makes you happiest but, in the end, the anxiety that accompanies constant money problems is probably not helping you get the best night’s sleep.  

    Know your important wants  

    In all of this, it’s easy to lose sight of how to enjoy life. Don’t cut every single want from your life. Don’t become a martyr to the savings cause. If you cut out all the little wants from your life, you’ll end up with the money to spend on the important wants- like travel, or a renovation. Use your spare cash on special things, and appreciate them for what they are. I don’t need an expensive haircut, but I know how good it makes me feel about myself and how much I love the whole ritual of a good haircut, so I’m willing to wear cheap clothes and have nights with friends at home so I can spoil myself once in a while. An odd want, but there you have it.

    AffluenzaThis concept can be easily applied to credit. Just because you use credit, shouldn’t give you a licence to buy whatever, whenever. Understand just because you don’t pay now doesn’t mean you won’t pay at some point for the credit you use. Save your credit for your important wants, and appreciate them all the more for their rarity.

    Maybe throw that long sought after holiday on the credit card and take the family away. Or take out repayments on an educational course that will change your working life forever. Or perhaps buy a home, but after years of good saving. One that fits all the requirements of what you need, rather than what you want. A home you don’t have to work 24/7 to pay off because it is priced within your means.

    What you shouldn’t do is spend money you don’t have, on things you don’t need, and ultimately find yourself with what you don’t want – debt, unhappiness and a bad credit history.

    Here’s some extra reading on this concept: http://mycra.com.au/blog/2011/07/caught-affluenza-affect-credit-rating-health/

    What does your credit file say about you?

    Think of your credit file as a mirror on your finances. It can reflect your assets, your good history, but it can also reveal your financial shortcomings. It can be a reflection of your inability to stick with something, your disregard for repayments and it shows the financial potholes we fall into that are sometimes impossible to climb out of.

    A bad credit rating can completely change your financial situation. The black marks placed there by creditors show up on your credit file for 5 years. Bad credit can limit your choices and can perpetuate the debt cycle by leading you to choose loans with higher interest rates and more fees, so the struggle to make repayments can be even harder.

    If you want to try and start again with credit, it may be possible to wipe the slate clean, particularly if your bad credit rating should not be there.  Firstly, obtain a free copy of your credit report from one or more of the credit reporting agencies, Veda Advantage, Dun & Bradstreet and Tasmanian Collection Services (TASCOL). If your credit file contains obvious inconsistencies or even if you’re not sure, you may be a good candidate for credit repair.

    A credit repairer can work with creditors on your behalf to completely clear your credit file of all defaults, clear-outs, writs and Judgments which contain errors, are unjust or just should not be there. This means we you longer have a bad credit rating, but a completely clear credit file, giving you the financial freedom to use credit whenever we need to.

    The rest is up to you.

    Image: David Castillo Dominici/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net

    Image 2: graur razvan ionut/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net

  • Rising menace of extreme identity theft looms

    Identity theftTechnology law expert Profressor Faye Jones and University of South Australia law lecturer Dr Clare Sullivan warn that the rising menace of extreme identity theft looms large. In a UniSA law seminar ‘Extreme identity theft: an international challenge’ they spoke about the ongoing threat of identity theft. We look at their release to the media on this fascinating topic. They implore people to understand how valuable their personal information is, and to guard it accordingly. No one wants to end up a victim of identity theft, and have their credit file misused.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    Unmasking the threat of identity theft

    …Dr Sullivan, an expert on digital identity, highlights an example in the US of a teacher who, upon discovering she had a bad credit rating, unravelled a 10 year long trail of deception in which a person had forged her identity, bought a house and gained employment – using her details.

     The anonymity attached to online behaviour and the amount of personal data that is readily available online has made it easier for false digital identities to be created or assumed, says Dr Sullivan. 

     “Years ago in Melbourne there was an identity thief who would use the names and dates of births on peoples’ tombstones to apply for birth certificates. With that, they would open a bank account, apply for employment registration cards and then passports.

     “These days that information is even more readily available. A full name, date of birth, gender and one other piece of identification, most often a signature or a PIN number, are sometimes all that is needed to steal a person’s identity.”

     “Most often people do this for reasons of fraud and their victims may not know what has happened until weeks or months later. The victim is on the back foot and they have to prove that they are who they say they are and that is not necessarily easy.”

     As to possible remedies, the suggestions of keeping Government compiled databases on individuals’ identities would have huge privacy and security implications.

     “Once you start putting those things into just one big database, well no database is secure,” Dr Sullivan says.

     “This was an issue for the UK and their identity scheme. In a way it’s more vulnerable – it’s like putting all the crown jewels in just one cupboard.

     “Technological innovations, including those which use biometrics – fingerprints, face scans and iris scans have error rates. Sometimes the error rate is low but they do exist. TV shows like CSI give a public perception that biometrics are infallible but they are not.”

     “The best advice is to recognise just how valuable your personal information is, try not to collect all your details together in one place and also try to build personal relations with people in organisations, like a bank for example, who will recognise you, who could verify your identity.”

     The absence of personal contact in the modern world is one of the reasons why identify theft is easier to facilitate says Dr Sullivan, and the assumption of a person’s identity is an issue not just confined to electronic fraud.

    In an echo of the Leonardo DiCaprio film Catch Me If You Can, which charted the life of a young con artist, in January a teenager who had impersonated doctors in hospitals in Adelaide was arrested and charged with identity theft.

    Pretty scary stuff. What’s worse is the identity theft victim then needs to prove to Creditors they didn’t initiate the credit in their name in order to have the offending defaults removed from their credit file. This is not always an easy thing to do with very few consumers knowing what to say to get the right information they need to prove their case and often the identity theft taking place long before the victim finds out about it.

    According to a survey in the U.S. by Javelin Strategy and Research, incidents of identity fraud in the United States are at their highest in three years. Incidents of identity fraud affected 5.26 percent of U.S. adults last year. That’s up from 4.9 percent in 2011 and 4.35 percent in 2010. The company put the total number of identity victims in 2012 at 12.6 million.

    In Australia, it is evident we are not immune and it is important to stay vigilant. Here are some simple steps you can take NOW to improve your chances of avoiding identity theft.

    What You Can Do To Prevent Identity Theft.

    1. Keep virus software up to date on your computer. Install automatic updates and perform regular virus scans.

    2. Keep your privacy settings secure on all social networking sites.

    3. Keep your passwords and PIN numbers secure. Don’t carry PIN numbers with your credit/debit cards, change  passwords regularly and use a variety of passwords for different purposes.

    4. Check all your credit card and bank statements each time they come in.

    5. Cross-shred all personally identifiable information which you no longer need, rather than throwing it straight in the  bin.

    6. Buy a safe for your personal information at home.

    7. Do not give any personal information or credit card details to anyone via phone or email unless you are sure the site is secure, and or you can verify the company details.

    8. Be aware of who gets your personal information and for what purposes. What can these people do with the information they are gathering? For instance, is it really necessary for the site you are registering on to have your date of birth?

    9. Keep up to date with the latest scams by subscribing to the government’s ‘SCAM watch’ website.

    10Check your credit file for free every 12 months. By requesting a copy of your credit file from one or more of the major credit reporting agencies, Veda Advantage, Dun & Bradstreet and Tasmanian Collection Service (TASCOL) you can be aware of any discrepancies which may need to be investigated. Often it is only through a credit check which comes back with defaults on our credit file do we realise we have been victims of identity theft.

    11. Report any incident of identity theft, no matter how small, or even if you have been reimbursed for the damage – to the Police. The more of us that report identity theft, the more effective will be our Government and Police response to it.

    Image: Chris Sharp/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net

     

     

  • Don’t launch a cyber-assault on Australian businesses – just look in their rubbish bins.

    [fusion_builder_container type=”flex” hundred_percent=”no” equal_height_columns=”no” menu_anchor=”” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” class=”” id=”” background_color=”” background_image=”” background_position=”center center” background_repeat=”no-repeat” fade=”no” background_parallax=”none” parallax_speed=”0.3″ video_mp4=”” video_webm=”” video_ogv=”” video_url=”” video_aspect_ratio=”16:9″ video_loop=”yes” video_mute=”yes” overlay_color=”” video_preview_image=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” padding_top=”” padding_bottom=”” padding_left=”” padding_right=””][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ layout=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” border_position=”all” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding_top=”” padding_right=”” padding_bottom=”” padding_left=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” center_content=”no” last=”true” min_height=”” hover_type=”none” link=”” border_sizes_top=”” border_sizes_bottom=”” border_sizes_left=”” border_sizes_right=”” first=”true”][fusion_text]

    dumpster divingMedia Release

    Don’t launch a cyber-assault on Australian businesses – just look in their rubbish bins.

    21 February 2013

    The identities of thousands of Australian consumers could be at risk every day through simply having their personal information dumped into the rubbish bins of Australian businesses, and a consumer advocate for accurate credit reporting says this practice is an appalling oversight when personal information has become so valuable to fraudsters.

    The National Association of Information Destruction (NAID-ANZ), which is the peak body for the secure destruction industry, recently hired a detective agency to find out what customer information was being thrown away unsecured in business rubbish bins.[/fusion_text][fusion_separator style_type=”default” hide_on_mobile=”small-visibility,medium-visibility,large-visibility” sticky_display=”normal,sticky” class=”” id=”” flex_grow=”0″ top_margin=”” bottom_margin=”” width=”” alignment=”center” border_size=”” sep_color=”” icon=”” icon_size=”” icon_color=”” icon_circle=”” icon_circle_color=”” /][/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container][fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible” type=”flex”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ layout=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding_top=”” padding_right=”” padding_bottom=”” padding_left=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none” align_self=”flex-start” border_sizes_undefined=”” first=”true” last=”true” hover_type=”none” link=”” border_position=”all”][fusion_text][i]

    The investigator went through the contents of publicly accessible waste bins used by 80 Sydney businesses that have an established responsibility to client data, with the aim of discovering the relative percentage of confidential waste that might be available on a given day.

    They found 11 per cent of those businesses contained crucial personal information readily accessible to passers-by and identity thieves.

    “Some sectors did better than others,” said NAID CEO Robert Johnson. “For instance, of the nine randomly sampled trash bins serving government offices, no confidential information was found. On the other hand, bank branches fared less well with 40 percent found to be casually discarding confidential financial information.”

    The study involved someone ‘casually’ looking at a bin, rather than dissecting it in an overly-thorough manner.

    CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair, Graham Doessel says “dumpster diving”– a practice of looking through rubbish bins for personally identifiable information is well used amongst fraudsters – and unlike many other forms of attempted identity theft, can be easily prevented through careful destruction of personal information.

    “It is best practice in my organisation and I am sure in many others, to cross-shred every piece of personal information that is no longer required. If it is good enough for small business, it should be good enough for bigger business such as banks to properly dispose of this information,” he says.

    On Monday new Attorney-General, Mark Dreyfus QC warned that Australian businesses were increasingly being targeted for cyber-assaults.

    “Cyber attacks have shifted from being indiscriminate and random to being more coordinated and targeted for financial gain. Most attacks occur from outside the business, although it appears internal risks are also significant,” Mr Dreyfus said.[ii]

    Mr Doessel says whilst cyber crime is becoming increasingly prevalent, basic data destruction is still a pressing topic.

    “We can’t forget about educating Australian businesses on data destruction and this simple way they can prevent their clients’ personal information from being stolen by identity thieves,” he says.

    He says consumers should feel unnerved that it was so easy for the investigators to come across personal information in rubbish bins.

    “Pieces of personal information are basically the building blocks of identity theft. Crucial details such as full names, addresses and dates of birth can all be used to build a profile on the victim which can then be used to assume their identity and even take out credit in their name. Often victims don’t know about it right away – and that’s where their credit file can be compromised,” Mr Doessel says.

    He says once the victim’s credit rating is damaged due to defaults from this ‘stolen’ credit, they are facing some difficult times repairing their credit rating in order to get their life back on track.

    “These victims often can’t even get a mobile phone in their name. It need not be large-scale fraud to be a massive detriment to their financial future – defaults for as little as $100 will stop someone from getting a home loan for the five year term,” he says.

    He says what is not widely known is how difficult credit repair can be – even if the individual has been the victim of identity theft.

    “There is no certainty that defaults can be removed from a victim’s credit file. The onus is on them to prove their case and provide copious amounts of documentary evidence,” he says.

    /ENDS.

    Please contact:

    Lisa Brewster – Media Relations media@mycra.com.au

    Graham Doessel – CEO pH 3124 7133

    Ph 07 3124 7133 www.mycra.com.au www.mycra.com.au/blog

    MyCRA Credit Repair 246 Stafford Rd, STAFFORD Qld

    MyCRA is Australia’s number one in credit rating repairs. We permanently remove defaults from credit files.

    ——————————————————————————–

    [i] http://www.brokernews.com.au/news/breaking-news/brokers-trump-banks-in-protecting-client-info-148810.aspx

    [ii] http://www.attorneygeneral.gov.au/Mediareleases/Pages/2013/First%20quarter/18February2013-CyberattacksonAustralianbusinessmoretargetedandcoordinated.aspx

    Image: Naypong/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net[/fusion_text][/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

  • Threat of identity theft looms as business cyber-assaults take new form.

    cyber-assaultMedia Release

    Threat of identity theft looms as business cyber-assaults take new form.

    20 February 2013

    The ramping up of efforts by fraudsters to go after Australian businesses holding personal information could contribute to a greater risk of identity theft and subsequent credit fraud for Australian consumers, warns a consumer advocate for accurate credit reporting.

    Yesterday new Attorney-General, Mark Dreyfus QC advised that recent national survey results for more than 250 major businesses show cyber-crime is becoming increasingly targeted and coordinated, with one in five businesses experiencing one in the last year.

    Mr Dreyfus said that cyber assaults have shifted from being indiscriminate and random to being more coordinated and targeted for financial gain. Most occur from outside the business, although it appears internal risks are also significant.[fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”][i]

    The 2012 Cyber Crime and Security Survey Report commissioned by CERT Australia and conducted by the Centre for Internet Safety at the University of Canberra revealed that most serious assaults involved the use of malicious software, theft or breach of private information and denial-of-service.

    In one case, an organisation reported the theft of 15 years’ worth of critical business data.

    A third of instances involved the theft of notebooks, tablets or mobile devices.

    CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair, Graham Doessel says Australians should feel concerned about where their personal information could be exposed to potential company data breaches, as personal information has become a valuable commodity used to commit identity theft and potentially ruin the victim’s credit rating and their financial future.

    “We can’t take lightly the possibility that any company that keeps data on its customers could be at risk of cyber-crime. Identity theft is becoming more prevalent, and personal information is lucrative for fraudsters,” Mr Doessel says.

    Last week the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) announced the identities of four tax agents were stolen and used to fraudulently obtain AUSkeys giving access to specialist tax agent online services.

    Whilst the ATO was able to contain the threat, and cancel the AUSkeys, it said in a statement to the media that doing business online has benefits, but also comes with risks.

    “People looking to commit identity fraud constantly look for ways to profit so it is critical to remain vigilant regarding your personal information and online security,” the ATO statement said.[ii]

    Mr Doessel says this instance is one of a long line of assaults on Australian businesses and government entities in recent years.

    “Unfortunately it seems everywhere people turn one entity or another has been hacked – and it seems everyone with a computer is at risk. It is still extremely scary the level of risk peoples’ personal information undergoes these days when it is stored online,” he says.

    Personal information in the wrong hands can lead not only to identity theft but credit fraud, which involves the use of the victim’s credit rating, which can have significant long term consequences.

    “Basically, a lot of identity fraud is committed by piecing together enough personal information from different sources in order for criminals to take out credit in the victim’s name. Often victims don’t know about it right away – and that’s where their credit file can be compromised,” he says.

    He says once the victim’s credit rating is damaged due to defaults from this ‘stolen’ credit, they are facing some difficult times repairing their credit rating in order to get their life back on track.

    “These victims often can’t even get a mobile phone in their name. It need not be large-scale fraud to be a massive detriment to their financial future – defaults for as little as $100 will stop someone from getting a home loan,” he says.

    Once an unpaid account goes to default stage, the account may be listed by the creditor as a default on a person’s credit file. Under current legislation, defaults remain on the credit file for a 5 year period.

    “What is not widely known is how difficult restoring a credit file can be – even if the individual has been the victim of identity theft, there is no assurance the defaults can be removed from their credit file. The onus is on the victim to prove their case and provide copious amounts of documentary evidence,” he says.

    Changes to the Privacy Act 1988 should help consumers collectively when businesses experience cyber-crime which leads to a data breach.[iii]

    From March 2014, increased powers of the Privacy Commissioner will force organisations that experience a breach to do something about it. Previously, the Commissioner could investigate and make recommendations as to what the organisation should do, but it had no way of requiring the organisation to take action.

    The Commissioner can also issue civil penalties to organisations that experience a breach and either fail to take reasonable steps to protect the information entrusted to them, or fail to adequately respond.

    Mr Doessel says consumers need to be insisting that the companies who hold their personal information have adequate tools to prevent a data breach, but he says despite this, the changing nature of cyber-crime means it can be difficult to keep up with the technology of fraudsters.

    “Despite our best efforts to keep our details safe, we don’t have control over the IT systems of the company which holds our information, so we have to place a lot of trust in them to stay one step ahead of fraudsters. With most organised crime gangs now placing identity theft on their repertoire, more damaging and more frequent assaults are probably imminent in the future,” Mr Doessel says.

    He says as a matter of routine, consumers should check their bank and credit card statements thoroughly when they come in, and should also order a copy of their credit report regularly – which would indicate if their credit file had been misused.

    Under current legislation a credit file report can be obtained at no cost every 12 months from the major credit reporting agencies Veda Advantage, Dun and Bradstreet and TASCOL (if in Tasmania) and is sent to the owner of the credit file within 10 working days.

    /ENDS.

    Please contact:

    Lisa Brewster – Media Relations media@mycra.com.au

    Graham Doessel – Director Ph 3124 7133

    Ph 07 3124 7133 www.mycra.com.au www.mycra.com.au/blog

    MyCRA Credit Repair 246 Stafford Rd, STAFFORD Qld

    MyCRA is Australia’s number one in credit rating repairs. We permanently remove defaults from credit files.

    ——————————————————————————–

    [i] http://www.attorneygeneral.gov.au/Mediareleases/Pages/2013/First%20quarter/18February2013-CyberattacksonAustralianbusinessmoretargetedandcoordinated.aspx

    [ii] http://www.ato.gov.au/corporate/content.aspx?doc=/content/00345567.htm

    [iii] http://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy-portal/resources_privacy/Privacy_law_reform.html#whats_changed

    Image: Victor Habbick/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net[/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

  • Credit rating self-checks essential for prospective home buyers

    prospective home buyersMedia Release

    Credit rating self-checks essential for prospective home buyers.

    19 February 2013

    A credit rating self-check should be top priority for prospective home buyers before finance application to ensure ‘surprise’ bad credit doesn’t mean they lose their dream home, according to a consumer advocate for accurate credit reporting.

    CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair, Graham Doessel, says a credit file check will reveal any adverse listings which will lead to credit refusal.

    “Home buyers should ignore their credit file when applying for finance at their own peril. In many instances it can be more important to have a clear credit rating than a huge deposit,” Mr Doessel says.

    He says many people assume if they pay their bills on time they should have a clear credit history, but surprise bad credit and credit reporting errors can and do occur.

    “So many of my clients are unaware they have defaults until they apply for major credit such as a home loan, and are flatly refused because of defaults. The clients can lose the house and have their dreams shattered, all because of a credit file which contains defaults that may not even be lawful,” he says.

    A credit file exists for anyone who has ever been ‘credit active’ and is used by lenders to assess the risk and borrowing capacity of potential borrowers.

    Defaults are put there by creditors when accounts have remained unpaid for more than 60 days.

    Defaults remain on a person’s credit file for 5 years from the date of listing, and have the potential to severely impact a person’s ability to obtain credit.

    “Currently, any default can be enough for an automatic decline with most of the major banks. Many lenders are even rejecting loans for excess enquiries such as two in thirty days or six within the year.”

    “It also affects the type of loan people may be eligible for, the interest rate they are offered and price of establishing the loan. The lending options become more expensive and limited,” Mr Doessel says.

    He says many clients had what they thought were impeccable repayment histories, but found out the hard way that they were the victim of credit reporting errors.

    “At this time in Australia, creditors basically have the go ahead to list defaults and other negative listings on consumer credit files with very little by way of checking in terms of accuracy of that listing,” Mr Doessel says.

    The onus is on the consumer to ensure their credit file reads accurately.

    “That’s why it’s so important for everyone to know what is said about them on their credit file, and to know how to dispute any errors that come up,” he says.

    House hunters can request a copy of their credit report from one of the major credit reporting agencies such as Veda Advantage, Dun and Bradstreet or TASCOL (if in Tasmania). These agencies will provide people with a free copy of their report within 10 working days from receipt of the request.

    “If you request this report well before you are ready to buy a house, you can potentially save yourself the embarrassment and heartache of being knocked back for finance due to credit file defaults, and that’s also one less lender-generated credit enquiry on your credit file,” he says.

    Demand for ‘credit rating repairers’ has grown due to what Mr Doessel says is a credit system fraught with difficulties.

    He says many of his clients have attempted to dispute an unfair listing themselves and have come up against problems.

    “Most times the Creditor says defaults are never removed, but can be marked as paid if the account has been settled. Effectively they are bullied into paying the overdue account and are still copping the default on their credit file.”

    But Mr Doessel says if a listing contains errors or inconsistencies, it should be removed.

    “It takes someone who is aware of how to work within the legislation, demonstrate effectively where the Creditor has made errors and show cause as to why a listing is unlawful and should be removed. Unfortunately this is something many consumers have neither the time and or skills to do effectively,” he says.

    /ENDS.

    Please contact:

    Graham Doessel – CEO MyCRA Ph: 07 3124 7133

    Lisa Brewster – Media Liaison media@mycra.com.au

    246 Stafford Road, STAFFORD QLD. http://www.mycra.com.au

    MyCRA Credit Repair is Australia’s number one in credit rating repair. We permanently remove defaults from credit files.

    Image: graur codrin/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net