MyCRA Specialist Credit Repair Lawyers

Tag: credit listing complaint

  • Credit file education could help consumers save money and reduce default numbers

    Media Release

    Credit file education could help consumers save money and reduce default numbers

    19 June 2012

    Brokers who provide extra education to their clients to ensure full comprehension of mortgage and loan products, could start with education on the fundamentals of obtaining credit, and particularly how to address credit listing complaints, a consumer advocate for credit reporting accuracy says.

    Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repairs, Graham Doessel says potential obligations to educate clients under NCCP as part of the move towards responsible lending could include education on basic credit rights and responsibilities of credit reporting, as well as the ins and outs of the specific finance products offered.

    “Too many people are just not savvy enough about their credit file, and the impact it has on their financial future. Too many people are forced to learn the hard way through being lumbered with bad credit just how the system works,” Mr Doessel says.

    This recommendation comes as industry commentator Kym Dalton claims many borrowers have limited knowledge of the meaning of mortgage products and terms, and that merely satisfying NCCP disclosure requirements may not be enough to keep brokers safe.

    “Disclosure and comprehension are not the same,” he said. “Borrowers are frequently nervous about asking questions when applying for a loan, in case it jeopardises their application,” he told Australian Broker yesterday.

    Mr Doessel suggests further credit education from a broker perspective could begin with some core topics which frequently see consumers come unstuck:

    ·         What a credit file is and what can be reported on it;

    ·         How consumers get ‘bad credit history’;

    ·         The potential impact adverse listings have on a consumers ability to  borrow further;

    ·         The importance of regular credit file checks; and most importantly

    ·         What to do in instances of credit file inconsistencies.

    “Addressing credit file errors and inconsistencies is a big issue. Since an adverse credit listing disadvantages the consumer’s borrowing ability for between 5 and 7 years, there needs to be more education from the finance community as to what consumers can do if they want to dispute something on their credit file.

    Many consumers are really left in the dark about the process and are often told by Creditors that listings cannot be removed from their credit file, and this is unfair,” he explains.

    Mr Doessel says the crucial area of credit listing complaint education could mean brokers help save consumers thousands.

    “Families who are funnelled into a non-conforming loan due to a bad credit rating will be paying a staggering $15,046.57 more just over the first three years of the loan on an average loan amount of $300,000. This is based on a standard variable rate of 7% versus a non-conforming interest rate of 9%,” he says.

    Due to the increase in people saving rather than spending in Australia, many of his credit repair clients are in a better financial position than they have been in years for loan qualification, but are held back from taking advantage of competitive interest rates and stable house prices by black marks on their credit rating.

    “Many clients tick all the boxes for loan approval, until they are knocked back due to credit rating defaults they were previously unaware of – and often those defaults should not be there,” he says.

    He says the best way brokers can prevent this scenario is to help consumers to get savvy with their credit file and the ways their good name can be compromised.

    “People also need to know that clearing credit ratings of errors is neither easy nor quick. They can get the run around from Creditors, but if they believe the listing should not be there, it is a point worth fighting for.

    He says if people have neither the time, nor knowledge of legislation that is required to deal with Creditors, over their credit reporting inaccuracies, a credit repairer can do the work for them.

    “A credit repairer uses their knowledge of credit reporting law to make a more effective case based on the appropriate legislation and also negotiates with the Creditor on the consumer’s behalf for the removal of those inconsistencies from their credit file,” Mr Doessel says.

    /ENDS

    Please contact:

    Graham Doessel – CEO  MyCRA Credit Rating Repairs       Ph 3124 7133

    Lisa Brewster – Media Relations   Mob: 0450 554 007 media@mycra.com.au

    http://www.mycra.com.au/ www.mycra.com.au/blog

    MyCRA Credit Repairs is Australia’s leader in credit rating repairs. We permanently remove defaults from credit files.

    ——————————————————————————–
    http://www.brokernews.com.au/article/borrower-education-fundamental-for-brokers-140921.aspx

    Image: tungphoto/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net

  • Credit reporting changes introduced into Parliament

    Further to news on changes to Australia’s Privacy Laws, the Attorney-General Nicola Roxon announced that much awaited changes to the Privacy Act 1988 were introduced into Parliament yesterday. These changes will affect your credit file and how your good and bad credit history is shown.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repairs and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    The Attorney-General said The Privacy Amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) Bill 2012 represents the most significant developments in privacy reform since Labor introduced the Privacy Act in 1988.

    All of these changes have significant bearing on credit reporting accuracy in Australia, as an individual’s credit file contains so much personal information which is checked to assess risk when an individual applies for credit. It can also be subject to misuse and error.

    The laws are promised to strengthen the power of the consumer over this important Privacy right.

    “These new privacy laws focus on giving power back to consumers over how organisations use their personal information,” the Attorney-General said in a statement to the media yesterday.

    This statement also addressed credit reporting specifically.

    The Government has promised to ‘modernise’ credit reporting arrangements. The Attorney-General was more specific with some of the changes coming in with the introduction of comprehensive credit reporting as part of these Privacy Act 1988 reforms:

    • making a clear obligation on organisations to substantiate, or show their evidence to justify, disputed credit listings
    • making it easier for individuals to access and correct their credit reporting information
    • prohibiting the collection of credit reporting information about children
    • simplifying the complaints process by removing requirement to complain to the organisation first, complaints can be made directly to the Privacy Commissioner, and by introducing alternative dispute resolution to more efficiently deal with complaints.

    The Government says it expects the credit industry will benefit because the reforms provide a more accurate picture of an individual’s credit situation to help them make a robust assessment of credit risk, which is expected to lead to lower credit default rates.

    Namely, this refers to the controversial introduction of late payment notations on consumer credit files. Late payments will be added by licenced creditors even if a bill is one day late. The notation remains on the individual’s credit file for 2 years. It is unclear at this stage the exact process of law governing how late payments may be added to credit files, nor the precise way these late payments will be used when assessing risk and the potential impact on an individual’s ability to obtain credit.

    I can’t help expecting some real confusion over this type of data to occur particularly in the early days whilst data has been collected without individuals knowing the potential impact on their credit file information, and generally arguments and confusion from consumers over what may constitute a bad credit risk after these laws are introduced.

    Australian Broker published an article Credit Agencies rejoice as positive regime gets a kickstart, today in which Dun & Bradstreet’s Director of Consumer Services, Steve Brown said comprehensive credit reporting should open up credit for some groups of people.

    “The use of comprehensive rather than just negative credit information provides greater visibility of under-served consumers who would otherwise find it difficult to access credit,” Mr Brown said.

    This assumption would be due to people being able to now ‘counteract’ a late payment notation or potentially a default listing through their repayment performance history. This could mean that if people have a 5 or even 7 year listing on their credit file, they may be able to show that over a period of 2 years (the length of repayment performance history recorded) they have managed to pay their bills on time. It would then be up to the lender to assess whether they believe a consumer or business with a default who has paid their bills on time for the past 2 years is or isn’t a credit risk.

    Whilst in theory this works, I am concerned this is very subjective and lenders could err on the side of caution especially initially.

    At the moment I believe ‘repayment performance history’ only adds to the volume of negative data which will be visible on consumer credit files. I will be interested to see if in the coming years and months the advantage to this system does in fact materialise in the form of consumers with defaults being given a fairer go due to better repayment history before I am truly convinced.

    Some significant submissions put forward to the Senate Finance and Public Administration Legislation Committee which were accepted by the Government and which should benefit consumers include:

    • Streamlining the correction and complaints process for credit reporting
    • During a correction complaint, the Creditor must give justification for credit listings and actually substantiate the information is reports on credit files.
    • Consumers may complain directly to the appropriate Ombudsman rather than having to go through the organisation’s complaints process first.
    • The provision for remedies such as compensation for consumers who are negatively impacted by a Creditor who has failed to comply with credit reporting law.

    MyCRA will be very intent on seeing how the laws pan out for the actual application of these significant changes for consumers and their credit file information.

    If people have bad credit history which they believe shouldn’t be there, or the data on their credit file is inconsistent – they can contact a professional credit rating repairer to get advice about formulating a credit listing complaint. Call MyCRA Credit Rating Repairs on 1300 667 218 or visit our website www.mycra.com.au.