MyCRA Specialist Credit Repair Lawyers

Tag: positive credit reporting

  • The Australian credit reporting system is one based exclusively on Negative Credit Reporting

    The Australian credit reporting system is one based almost exclusively on “Negative Credit Reporting”.

    By Graham Doessel – Founder & CEO of MyCRA Expert Credit Repair Laywers

    [fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”]

    MyCRA Lawyers Turns Your Poor Credit Reporting System Into A Clean Credit Rating For Consumers
    MyCRA Lawyers Turns Your Poor Credit Reporting System Into A Clean Credit Rating For Consumers

    It has be (wrongly) reported that the new So Called “Comprehensive” Credit Reporting is “Positive Credit Reporting” but nothing could be further from the truth as the comprehensive credit reporting changes (while there were a couple of nice amendments) simply added more Negative records to a consumers credit file.

    Some of the (dare I say it) POSITIVE changes that came about on March 12th 2014 include:

    • Bankruptcy will appear on your credit file for 2 years less
    • A clear-out (7 years) will be downgraded to a default (5 years) upon payment
    • Minimum default (5 years) amount increased from $100 to $150
    • A consumer now has to be 74 days in arrears before they can be defaulted

    But there is still no way for a consumer to “Improve” their credit score (I.e. by paying off their loan quickly and on time etc.)

    Every day we still find creditors that do not:

    • Understand
    • Agree with; OR
    • Comply with the credit reporting legislation

    Which means good people get bad credit when – as you mentioned previously – they lived at the same address and had capacity to pay.

    We find that with Energy companies specifically, common sense does not often seem to apply.

    For example,

    • You live at 123 Smith St,
    • You call “Energy Company” and say that you need;
    • The power connected at 456 Jones St on the 15th; and
    • The power disconnected from 123 Smith St on the 17th as you are moving.

    They will follow your instructions BUT…

    • Will mostly send the final bill for 123 Smith St to 123 Smith St AFTER you have moved
    • Will often list you for fraudulently avoiding your bills as a Clearout (7 years) as you don’t pay the final bill at 123 smith St –
      • All the while knowing you are the same person, at 456 Jones Street.

    Our clients are often frustrated that the “Energy Company” didn’t send the final bill to 456 Jones St as “We told them we were moving”…

    The “Energy Companies” often try to argue that it’s a ‘different department’ however this argument is Flawed…

     

    [/fusion_builder_column][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”]

    Common Sense
    MyCRA Lawyers Helps Creditors See Common Sense And Your Bad Credit Removed

    Another lack of common sense example is:

    • You called “Energy Company” to disconnect the power on the 17th.
    •  The “Energy Company” never asked for a forwarding address so still send the final bill to the disconnected power address.

    In both of these examples, you are likely to have the default removed by MyCRA Lawyers.

    Many Ombudsmen and organisations like the “Consumer Action Legal Center” and “CHOICE” have slammed some credit repairers as dodgy and one has taken out the CHOICE Shonky Award.

    There are however – many talented, dedicated and honest individuals, corporations and Law Firms like MyCRA Expert Credit Repair Lawyers (Pardon the blatant plug) alike that are able to remove Defaults, Clearouts  Judgments etc. quickly and cost effectively.

    My Firm, MyCRA Expert Credit Repair Lawyers focuses 100% of its time & resources on Credit Reporting related legislation and having defaults removed as quickly and as cost effectively as possible.

    Most defaults are removed from between $850 and $1500 each within a few weeks, and with our quickest ever removal, the creditor notifying us that the default would be removed just 37 minutes after we initially contacted them.

     Before you choose your credit repairing organisation, just make sure they:

    • Are a good fit for your business style, professional reputation and standing.
    • Make sure they have Professional Indemnity Insurance in place (Many don’t)
    • Have a recognised dispute resolution process / service in place
    • Have the ability to interpret legislation and Authority to make it happen.
    • Simply, Make sure they are someone you can trust

    MyCRA Lawyers  team (myself included) have been working with consumers with bad credit since 2003 (I owned Mortgage Now, Australia’s largest exclusively non-conforming brokerage 2003 to 2010) and have seen many scenarios that would break your heart.  No One can fix everything but when you choose to recommend a law firm, you are giving your clients the best chance at fixing their bad credit issues.

     

    Call MyCRA Expert Credit Repair Lawyers NOW On 1300 667 218 Today And Ask How You Get Up To $500 In Free Credit Repair Legal Help For Your Clients…[/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

  • Experian plans to enter Australian credit reporting – good news or bad?

    A newly formed credit reporting agency is set to change the nature of credit reporting in Australia.
    UK credit reporting giant Experian plans to enter the Aussie market. The company proposes to form a joint venture “Experian Australia Credit Services” with leading financial institutions ANZ, Citibank, Commonwealth Bank, GE Capital, NAB and Westpac. Experian will own 76% of the company, with the financial institutions owning the remaining 24%.
    Reporter for The Australian, Teresa Ooi ran the story on Friday, titled Experian Plans Credit Bureau in Australia. Experian’s newly appointed managing director, Kim Jenkins says the venture will increase bureau competition, drive innovation and deliver better services for clients and consumers.
    The aim of the new bureau will be to improve credit reporting efficiency, particularly in light of forthcoming plans to permit positive credit reporting, which is currently under consideration by the Government.
    “The prospect of an inclusive bureau in Australia, accessible to all industry sectors, will strengthen standards in credit reporting, data quality and governance — which is particularly important in a changing regulatory environment,” Ms Jenkins said.
    I believe the introduction of Experian into the Australian credit reporting system will increase competition, and can only improve efficiency and transparency. The changes which will occur when or if we switch to a positive credit reporting system will be well serviced by a company who has had years of experience with the system in the U.K.

    What does concern me, however is the joint venture with leading Australian financial institutions. Does a credit reporting agency remain neutral when its owners are effectively creditors? Since creditors are responsible for listings on a credit file in the first place, does that create a conflict of interest for Experian in providing objective credit reporting?
    The other question is, how much say will these financial institutions actually have? Currently Australian law gives a bigger voice to smaller shareholders in a company. With these institutions all having a common interest as ‘creditors’ and all having a smaller share in the company – where will the interests of the company as a credit reporting agency actually lie – with consumers or creditors?
    Perhaps our current credit reporting laws will be tough enough to ensure that all credit reporting remains neutral, regardless of the ownership of the company.
    It will be very interesting to see what develops from this issue.