MyCRA Specialist Credit Repair Lawyers

Tag: Attorney-General

  • 1 in 12 Australian credit ratings threatened by identity theft.

    Media Release

    Identity theft1 in 12 Australian credit ratings threatened by identity theft.

    24 October 2013

    A survey conducted for the Attorney-General’s Department reveals Australian credit ratings are under increasing threat from ballooning identity theft numbers, and a consumer advocate for accurate credit reporting warns victims can pay heavily, with many locked out of mainstream credit for years.

    CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair, Graham Doessel says when fraudsters take out credit in their victim’s name they can leave a trail of destruction on the victim’s credit file.

    “Fraudsters are never so kind as to pay the credit back. Defaults can then mount on the victim’s credit rating and hinder the victim’s ability to obtain credit in their own right,” Mr Doessel says.

    He goes on to say that “unless the victim can prove they didn’t initiate the credit in the first place, these defaults stay on the credit file for the term, which is five years.”

    The warnings come following the release of the ‘Identity Theft Concerns and Experiences‘ survey conducted by Di Marzio Research for the Attorney-General’s Department. (1)

    The survey found that identity theft had increased by a massive 40 per cent from 2011 to 2012 to almost one in four Australians having been a victim or known somebody who has been a victim of identity theft.

    It also showed 31 per cent of those victims had had their identity used to obtain finance, credit or a loan. This is an increase of 5 per cent from the previous survey in 2011.

    These figures correlate to almost one in every twelve Australians being victims of identity fraud which has had the potential to impact their credit rating.

    Mr Doessel says pieces of personal information are the building blocks for credit file misuse.

    “People can lose personal information in many ways, and they may be unaware of how or when it has occurred – particularly if it has happened via malware or even through too much sharing online,” he explains.

    “Sometimes it’s not until the victim applies for credit and is refused that they find out they have been exposed to identity fraud, and by then it may be too late to trace how it took place.”

    The survey pinpointed the private sector (Credit Providers such as banks and telcos) as providing victims with the most help with recovery, at 48 per cent – followed by Police at 32 per cent. Interestingly the government was cited as providing only 8 per cent of help with recovery, and 18 per cent of people had no help with recovery.

    But Mr Doessel warns that whilst Credit Providers may be able to help with reimbursing some identity theft victims, those that end up with defaults may not be so lucky.

    “It’s not a simple case of being ‘reimbursed’ for credit file misuse under the Credit Provider’s insurance. It is a slow and difficult process to try and recover a good name which has been tarnished,” he says.

    Mr Doessel says preventative measures centre around the safeguarding of personal information.

    “Get up to speed on the ways that fraudsters could misuse your personal information or your credit rating. Put as many preventative measures in place as possible, so that you have the least possible chance of becoming a victim.”

    “Also, check for credit file discrepancies. We recommend people regularly obtain a copy of their credit report to ensure that everything on their file is as it should be. That way if there are any problems, they can be rectified while there is no urgency,” he says.

    Under current legislation a credit file report can be obtained for free every 12 months from the major credit reporting agencies Veda Advantage, Dun and Bradstreet and TASCOL (if in Tasmania) and is sent to the owner of the credit file within 10 working days, or for a fee it can be sent urgently.

    Mr Doessel adds, Australia needs to create a culture of transparency when it comes to combatting this crime.

    “Talk, talk, and talk some more, about what you know about identity theft.  If you’re a victim – tell others about your story. In particular, talk to young people who might not fully understand the consequences of giving away their personal information and also talk to older people – who may be less tech-savvy and more vulnerable to predators,” he advises.

    You can find more information on identity theft on the Attorney General’s Website http://www.ag.gov.au/identitysecurity.

    /ENDS.

    Please contact:

    Graham Doessel – CEO Ph 3124 7133

    Lisa Brewster – Media Relations media@mycra.com.au

    Ph 07 3124 7133 www.mycra.com.au www.mycra.com.au/blog

    MyCRA Credit Repair 246 Stafford Rd, STAFFORD Qld

    MyCRA is Australia’s number one in credit rating repairs. We permanently remove defaults from credit files.

    (1) http://www.ag.gov.au/RightsAndProtections/IdentitySecurity/Documents/Identity%20Theft%20Data%20Survey%20Report%202012%20[PDF%205.3MB].pdf
    Unsubscribe me from this list

    Image: Victor Habbick/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net[/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

  • Mandatory data breach notification Bill before Parliament

    data securityThe Attorney-General has put before Parliament a mandatory data breach notification bill, which will require businesses and government agencies to notify people when a data breach affecting their privacy occurs. In our view this long overdue legislation is imperative to protect individuals who have their personal information unsecured in some way.  This will allow those individuals affected to take swift steps to secure their own records and personal information from identity crime. We look at why these laws are so important and how a data breach can impact a person’s credit file.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    Remember when Sony was hacked? Thousands of Sony Australia customers were kept in the dark about it for some time – and there wasn’t a thing our Privacy Commissioner could do after the fact, due to there being no legal requirement in Australia on businesses or other entities to notify individuals when a data breach in their business could impact their personal information.

    Events like that – along with a long list of other breaches – have inspired changes within our legislation.

    The Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus QC handed over The Privacy Amendment (Privacy Alerts) Bill 2013, for its first reading in parliament yesterday. If passed, amendments will be implemented along with other major amendments to the Privacy Act 1988, on March 12, 2014.

    The new laws will require notification of data breaches to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, on all entities covered by the Privacy Act 1988, including many businesses.

    The notification requirements do not apply to all data breaches, only breaches that give rise to a risk of serious harm. The Commissioner will be able to seek civil penalties if there is serious or repeated non-compliance with the notification requirements.

    “To make sure that the new laws have teeth, the Information Commissioner will be able to direct agencies and business to notify individuals of data breaches,” Mr Dreyfus said in a statement to the media on Tuesday.

    In a Computerworld article ‘Proposed mandatory data breach notification bill read in Parliament’, Privacy Commissioner, Timothy Pilgrim, reportedly said he has supported the introduction of mandatory data breach notification laws in Australia since they were first proposed by the Australian Law Reform Commission in 2008.

    “The last couple of years have seen a number of high-profile data breaches and subsequent own motion investigations initiated by me, and research suggests that the frequency of data breaches in Australia has continued to grow over the past three years,” he said.

    Despite this upward trend, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) received 46 data breach notifications in the 2011–12 financial year, an 18 per cent decrease from the previous year.

    “I am concerned that we are only being notified of a small percentage of serious data breaches that are occurring,” Pilgrim said. “Many critical incidents may be going unreported and consumers may be unaware when their personal information could be compromised.”

    Up to now, whilst organisations are encouraged to disclose data breaches to the Commonwealth Privacy Commissioner, it has not been mandatory to do so. There has been much criticism over companies “holding out” on their customers following a data breach, and waiting days or up to a week or so to notify customers that their personal information may be at risk.

    During this time, it has been argued that hackers have had free access to this personal information without the customer doing anything to minimise their own risk, such as cancelling accounts, changing passwords and flagging their credit accounts and credit file.

    We agree this is an area which is overdue for legislation, especially going in hand with other new Privacy Amendments already passed.

    We can’t take lightly the possibility that any company that keeps data on its customers could be exposed to data breaches. Identity theft is becoming more prevalent, and personal information is lucrative for fraudsters.

    Unfortunately it seems everywhere people turn some company has been hacked – and it seems every entity with a computer is vulnerable. It is still extremely scary the level of risk peoples’ personal information undergoes these days when it is stored online.

    Personal information in the wrong hands can lead not only to identity fraud, but the misuse of the victim’s credit file, which can have significant long term consequences.

    A lot of identity fraud is committed by piecing together enough personal information from different sources in order for criminals to take out credit in the victim’s name. Often victims don’t know about it right away – and that’s where their credit file can be compromised.

    Once the victim’s credit rating is damaged due to defaults from this ‘stolen’ credit, they are facing some difficult times repairing their credit rating in order to get their life back on track.

    These victims often can’t even get a mobile phone in their name. It need not be large-scale fraud to be a massive blow to their financial future – defaults for as little as $100 will stop someone from getting a home loan.

    Once an unpaid account goes to default stage, the account may be listed by the creditor as a default on a person’s credit file. Under current legislation, defaults remain on the credit file for a 5 year period.

    What is not widely known is how difficult credit repair following can be – even if the individual has been the victim of identity theft, there is no guarantee the defaults can be removed from their credit file. The onus is on them to prove their case and provide copious amounts of documentary evidence.

    Unfortunately data breaches are difficult for individuals to have any control over, and the only way people can ensure their details are safe are to demand that the companies they deal with have strong IT systems before disclosing that information.  People should adopt the philosophy of a need-to-know basis for disclosing their personal information. They should always question the need for it to be handed over. If it is not essential, they shouldn’t do it.

    The fact that our country is attempting to legislate this important area is a big step in the right direction. Forcing companies to act quickly would minimise the harm which could occur to the victims’ financial identity and credit file information. Whilst it won’t prevent all data breaches, it will encourage better security. A requirement to disclose potentially harmful breaches would mean a company’s bad security is thrown right into the limelight. And not even the big wigs would want that.

    Image: David Castillo Dominici/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net

  • Tax fraud worth $33 million linked to identity crime

    Victims struggle with recovery after tax fraud leaves them out of pocket. Could this type of identity crime threaten their  credit file?

    According to public documents, a staggering $33 million worth of suspected fraudulent tax refunds linked to identity crime have been blocked since July this year. Last week SC Magazine released an article ‘ID thieves steal tax returns’ revealing these figures.

    It reports criminals are lodging fraudulent returns with the ATO and also creating fake group certificates linked to real businesses.

    SC reports that the process of finding the fraudsters and reimburing victims is complicated and difficult:

    “Australian Federal Police are understood to be only able to investigate instances of fraud against the ATO if banks supply suspect account details. This is thought to scarcely occur.”

    “The task facing the ATO’s team of anti-fraud investigators is hard to overstate. The $33 million in fraudulent returns blocked since tax time represented a mere 0.67 per cent of total returns processed over the same period. The ATO had withheld pending review 1.2 per cent of returns amounting to $401 million in claims which it considered “overstated” or “potentially fraudulent”.

    And with the lion’s share of legitimate and fraudulent returns filed within four months, the office’s sophisticated fraud-detection systems are put on a hunt for the proverbial needle in the hack stack,” the article says.

    The ATO says it could not comment on investigations, but has promised to reimburse victims, saying they have a:

    “strong focus on raising awareness within the community about the importance of TFN protection and personal information,” it told SC Magazine.

    In the meantime, two of the victims interviewed by SC reported experiencing many issues with attempting to get to the bottom of the fraud themselves. There has reportedly been little assistance from the accountants responsible for lodging the fraudulent claims (they are reportedly not liable having lodged the claim in good faith), and after 30 calls to the ATO from one of the victims, still no answers and no refund yet.

    What we found most interesting about this article, was the last few paragraphs on the Australian Federal Police’s response to SC:

    “Matters of individual tax fraud should be handled by the ATO it [fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”][the AFP] said.

    It has five officers dedicated to investigating such fraud across Australia. it believed the victims should consult state police.

    For Cameron and Mansfield [the alleged fraud victims featured in the article], it remains unclear who they can turn to for assistance to recoup their lost tax claims.

    Short of obtaining a new TFN, agencies could offer little advice for victims of tax fraud.

    Government agencies broadly suggest victims of identity theft purchase a credit monitoring service and regularly check bank accounts,” the article says.

    The comments illustrate where we believe Australia can do more when it comes to identity theft – identity theft recovery.

    The media seems to frequently speak to identity theft victims, but many of them seem to have been unable to recover their lost monies, to find someone who shoulders the responsibility or gives them the answers or help they are looking for.

    Albeit it is early days for identity theft as a crime, but with a recent survey commissioned by the former Attorney-General revealing 1 in 6 people know someone or themselves have been a victim of identity theft, and the Australian Crime Commission citing identity crime as the fastest growing crime in Australia, it may be a pertinent time for victim recovery to be given more focus.

    In the SC article, it was recognised that the actual victim of fraud was the ATO, whose money was stolen by fraudsters. But what about the person whose identity was stolen? Are they at risk of further fraud in other areas?

    The fraudsters have detailed personal information on the victims, what to say they can’t take credit out in the victim’s name or use the information for other illegal purposes? Where should they go to be given advice on what to do?

    Recently we investigated identity theft recovery, and how it specifically relates to repairing a damaged credit rating. A damaged credit rating from identity theft can hurt the victim sometimes more than the original fraud. Not only can they owe the debt, and all subsequent fees to creditors they can be blacklisted from obtaining further credit in their names for 5 to 7 years. An identity theft victim who is not able to recover their credit rating is facing years of hardship. So where can victims turn for help?

    “Government agencies broadly suggest victims of identity theft purchase a credit monitoring service and regularly check bank accounts”

    This is true, but what was missed from the quotes in this article, was the fact that these victims may be eligible to apply at a Magistrate’s Court for a Commonwealth Victims of Identity Crime Certificate. Were victims told about their options in this regard?

    This Certificate is designed to give Commonwealth identity theft victims some kind of official substantiation to their claims of fraud.

    “A Commonwealth Victims’ Certificate helps support your claim that you have been the victim of Commonwealth identity crime. You can present the Certificate to an organisation such as a Government agency, or a business (such as a financial institution or credit agency).  This may help you negotiate with them to re‑establish your credentials or to remove a fraudulent transaction from their records.

    A certificate does not compel any organisation to take a particular action. It will not automatically re-establish a person’s credit rating or remove a fraudulent transaction from their record. It is also not admissible in any legal proceedings.” The Attorney-General’s website says.

    With recovery obviously so difficult, victims need any help they can get.

    If victims have their credit rating damaged for example, black marks are quite difficult for the individual to remove. When it comes to identity theft in our experience, creditors demand documentary proof to help with establishing that the victim did not initiate the credit in the first place. This certificate could certainly be a very valuable document for victims and we feel would greatly assist victims in substantiating their claims to creditors.

    During our investigations, we found it difficult to establish the ground rules as to what constituted a Commonwealth Indictable Offence, and a State Offence.

    The Attorney-General’s office advised us that the list of offences against the Commonwealth are so great, it is difficult to provide a full list for the public. They say that if any person suspects identity theft, they may be eligible and should just apply  for the Certificate, and a magistrate in their State will decide whether it is possible to obtain one on Commonwealth grounds.

    And as to whether these tax fraud victims would be eligible? A spokesperson for the Attorney-General advised us that that a Commonwealth indictable offence would include some instances of tax fraud:

    “This includes conduct relating to tax fraud such as when an individual dishonestly obtains a financial benefit from the Commonwealth by using another person’s identity,” the spokesperson said.

    They say it is up to the Police to pass on information on the Certificate to victims as they see appropriate for each individual fraud case. Apart from that, information is available on the Attorney-General’s website.

    It may be that the tax fraud victims at this stage have no need or claim for an identity crime certificate. But broadly speaking, it should be something which is promoted by all agencies as an avenue for recovery for victims. It could also be something State-based agencies could also look at adopting for identity theft victims.

    In the meantime, identity theft continues to affect 1 in 6 of us, and while Australia continues to iron out its laws and streamline its investigations, we believe the current victims are unlucky to be at the beginning of our development of effective recovery processes.
    For further help with credit repair information following identity theft, contact MyCRA Credit Repairs tollfree on 1300 667 218 or visit the main website www.mycra.com.au.

    Image: Arvind Balaraman / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

     

     [/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

  • The identity theft victim’s guide to recovery

    Have you been locked out of your Facebook account? Fallen for a request to give over personal details to a fraudster? Or had that horrible sinking feeling when you realise someone has been taking money out of your bank accounts? Or perhaps as was recently the case in W.A., you may have had a property sold from underneath you while overseas?

    These are all forms of identity theft in varying degrees. Someone steals your personal information in order to set up a fake identity for the purposes of using your good name, your financial identity, and possibly your credit rating for their own purposes.

    You are not alone, and you should not be too embarrassed to take action against this crime, however sheepish you may feel. It is an ever-growing problem – the fastest growing crime in Australia. A recent survey commissioned by the Attorney-General’s office shows 1 in 6 people in this country currently have been victims of identity theft, or know someone who has had their identity misused.

    Some instances of identity theft are relatively easy to recover from, others are a major source of heartache and disruption to people’s lives.

    The Attorney-General has produced an Identity Theft booklet which includes the steps you need to take as soon as you discover you may be an identity theft victim:

    •Immediately inform the police. All incidents of identity theft should be reported to your local police even if only small sums are involved. Ask for a copy of the police report—most banks or other financial institutions will ask you for a copy.

    •Close all unauthorised accounts. Contact the credit providers and businesses with whom any unauthorised accounts have been opened in your name. Remember this includes phone and other utility providers, department stores and financial institutions. Inform them that you have been a victim of identity theft and ask them to close the fraudulent accounts.

    •Alert your bank or financial institution. Contact your bank or financial institution immediately and cancel all cards and accounts that may have been breached. Ask for new cards and accounts with new Personal  Numbers (PINs).

    •Get a copy of your credit report. Inform the credit reporting agencies that you are a victim of identity theft. Ask that an alert be placed on your file that advises this. This should stop additional fraudulent accounts being opened in your name.

    •Review your credit report carefully. Ensure you can authenticate all ‘inquiries’ made into your credit history. Contact all companies and organisations that have made inquiries under your name that you did not authorise.

    •Keep all documentation. Take notes that include dates, names, contact details and what was said during your contact with those agencies. Follow up all conversations and requests in writing, and send these by certified mail if you need to post them. Keep copies of all forms and correspondence.

    •Report loss or theft of documents to the relevant government or private sector agencies. Contact the relevant government and private sector agencies if you have lost specific documents or items, or had them stolen.

    •Contact the Office of the Privacy Commissioner if you feel your privacy has been breached. If you feel that your privacy has been breached because of identity theft, or an agency or organisation is being difficult about rectifying privacy matters, then you can contact the Office of the Privacy Commissioner. Their Enquiries Line is available to help you work out if a privacy breach may have occurred. However, it is important that if you intend to lodge a complaint, that you first try and resolve matters with the agency or organisation concerned.

    Government-assisted Recovery

    Recovery from identity theft can be assisted in some instances if you are eligible to apply for a Victims of Commonwealth Identity Crime Certificate. Generally Police will advise you if the crime against you falls under this jurisdiction. It can improve the chances of recover greatly by having this certificate to provide to Government agencies, and financial institutions in which a Commonwealth indictable offence was committed against you.

    The Attorney General’s website says a Commonwealth identity crime occurs where a person makes, supplies or uses identification information (yours, or a third party’s). They do this intending that either they or someone else will pretend to be you or another person (who is living, dead, real or fictitious), and the act of pretending would be done to commit or help commit a Commonwealth indictable offence.

    But the instances in which an actual Commonwealth indictable offence is committed may be less common.

    Examples of victims of Commonwealth identity crime are:

    ■your birth certificate was used by someone else to falsely claim a payment from Centrelink in your name
    ■a person pretended to be you by using your identification details to have your Medicare rebates redirected to their bank account
    ■a person used your credit card without your permission to purchase and import illegal substances
    ■a person established a false business in your name to fraudulently claim GST, and
    ■a person used your passport or citizenship details to pass themselves off as you and travel overseas.

    The common identity theft victim who has had their personal details stolen and fraudsters have taken out credit cards in their name, it seems would not be eligible for the Commonwealth Victims of Crime certificate.

    For other very common type of identity theft through scams that were initiated outside Australia where victims have provided personal details and money – the Government’s SCAMwatch website warns victims recovery and restitution may also be difficult for victims:

    “due to the ‘fly by night’ nature of many scammers, it is extremely difficult to track them down and take action against them. Though it depends on the circumstances of each case, the ACCC may not be able to take action or enforce Australian Court orders against the many scammers that are based outside of
    Australia.” the SCAMWatch website explains.

    Identity theft and credit ratings

    If your bank accounts have been skimmed, the bank may have insurance to cover your loss due to this fraud. But if your credit rating has been damaged, and there are defaults, writs and Judgments on your credit file that should not be there, recovery can be a complicated matter. Basically your credit reports show you as owing debts and you are considered unsuitable to lend money to.

    Some identity theft victims find they hit a wall when attempting to recover their credit rating as the laws which govern credit reporting and the listing of negative data on people’s credit files are difficult for them to navigate. Victims say it is up to them to prove the case of identity theft, to prove to creditors they did not initiate the credit and some say this is confusing and frustrating for them.

    Instilling the services of a credit repairer may be helpful to your case, as the credit rating recovery can be enhanced by having a person better skilled at dealing with creditors and with complete knowledge of relevant laws and regulations which would apply to your circumstances.

    The way lending works in Australia, one default makes it just as difficult to get credit as does 3. So even if people can strike a helpful creditor in one or two instances, they may be unsuccessful in removing all negative listings by themselves. Each default remains on a person’s credit file for 5 years, so if you want the best chance of getting a home loan, a car loan or even credit cards and mobile phones over the next 5 years, it could be best to leave it to the professionals.

    For more help with clearing a credit rating following identity theft, contact MyCRA Credit Repairs Tollfree 1300 667 218 or visit our main website www.mycra.com.au.

    Image: graur razvan ionut/FreeDigitalPhotos.net

  • Can official Australian documents be forged to commit identity fraud?

    It is estimated identity theft costs Australia $1 billion per year.* When identity theft damages the victim’s credit rating – it is because the fraudster has been able to overtake credit accounts, or has gained access to enough personally identifiable information from the victim to forge new identity documents. This gives the fraudster access to credit cards, loans, even mortgages which allows them to extract significant amounts of money from the victim without them realising it straight away.

    If credit accounts are not repaid – after 60 days the credit file holder is issued with written notification of non-payment and the intention for the creditor to list a default on the person’s credit file. It is at this moment that some people who were previously unaware of any problems find out they have been victims of this more sophisticated type of identity theft. But often the credit file holder has also had their contact details changed – and this means it is not until they apply for credit in their own right and are refused that they find out about the identity fraud. This can be a significant time after the initial crime.

    Over the past year there have been reports in Western Australia of an elaborate property scam, in which overseas-based owners had their homes sold from under them by identity thieves. One property had been sold and settled months before the owner had any knowledge.

    “It is clear it was a sophisticated outfit that scammed the owner, the real estate agent, the settlement agent, the banks, and more importantly and critically, the Department of Land Administration (DOLA),” Real Estate Institute of Western Australia (REIWA) spokesperson Brian Greig told ZD Net when the story broke in September 2010.

    For identity theft victims who have had their credit rating affected, loss of money is just the beginning of their trouble. They lose the ability to borrow money. Dreams can be put on hold. Families and businesses can be put under immense stress. They can’t even get a mobile phone plan – and they are looking at a 5 year term for a default.

    Recovery is difficult. It is up to the identity theft victim to prove to creditors they did not initiate the credit in the first place. The victim is required to produce Police reports, bank statements and other documentation to prove their case. Their whole life is turned upside down in a desperate attempt to recover their good name. They often need professional help from a credit rating repairer as well as Police and Courts.

    The production and verification of key identification documents in Australia plays a crucial role in ensuring better security for individuals against this type of identity crime.

    Clearly the Government agrees there is a great need for a strong, unified identification system, but have they been effective in making this happen?

    In 2005 the Attorney-General’s department began plans to launch a Documentation Verification Service (DVS) as part of its National Identification Security Strategy (NISS). The DVS is intended to provide an electronic validation platform that allows authorised government agencies to cross-check identity documents to identify their clients and prevent identity theft or fraud.

    “It helps protect people’s identity and their privacy by allowing documents commonly used as evidence of identity to be checked electronically, quickly and directly by the document’s issuing authority,” Attorney-General Robert McClelland said recently in a media release.

    “Through the DVS it is possible to verify the validity of Australian-issued passports, visas, as well as birth, marriage and change-of-name certificates and driver licenses from States and Territories.”

    But the road to implementation of this system has been neither cheap (costing $25 million by 2010), or easy, with many reports of agencies failing to implement the system.

    Technology and security publication, CSO criticised the slow take-up of the service in its article ‘Australia crawls towards its answer to identity fraud’.

    The story features the Australian National Audit Office’s report on the program’s implementation. The Report slammed the program’s sluggish roll out last April, noting that the “rarely used” system was unlikely to strengthen Australia’s personal identification process in the near future.

    It says the main problem was that many of the identity issuer and user agencies, such as Centrelink, the Department of Immigration, and state road authorities and birth and death registries, were not connected to DVS. Verification using the system also took longer than 20 seconds in a quarter of transactions, eroding its promised efficiency gains and convenience.

    This week the Attorney-General’s department announced 200,000 documents had been verified using the system. It says with the full commitment of state and territory governments now in place the value of the system is being demonstrated, with a number of Commonwealth and state agencies using it for processes that require identity verification.

    It is not clear on the volume of agencies who have committed to adopting the DVS as part of their client registration process. The AG says there are a “wide range” of agencies, which include revenue, superannuation, electoral, land title and service delivery agencies.

    Australians are facing an ever increasing number of threats against their identity. According to an identity theft survey commissioned by the Attorney-General himself, 1 in 6 people in Australia have been or know someone who has had their identity misused in some way in the past 6 months.

    With this knowledge, it would seem all agencies should be implored to take up this service or perhaps we should look again at why some agencies are failing to use it. Surely a streamlined approach to document verification is essential protection for Australians.

    One thing is certain, if identity theft really is the emerging crime with the magnitude and scope that is reported, people need to know the fundamentals that make up their identity – their passports, their licences and their birth certificates are bullet-proof from attack.

    * OECD Committee on Consumer Policy, Online Identity Theft, February 2009, p. 37

    Contact MyCRA Credit Repairs for further help with identity theft, or to repair a credit rating on 1300 667 218.

    Image: Photostock/ FreeDigitalPhotos.net