MyCRA Specialist Credit Repair Lawyers

Tag: acma

  • Slap on the wrist for Telstra under TCP Code

    global roamingTelstra customers were overcharged over $30 million on global roaming charges between 2006 and 2012 – and under the new Telecommunications Consumer Protection Code (TCP Code), the telco giant has been issued a formal warning from the Australian Communications and Media Authority rather than a fine.  Is the TCP Code effective in asserting real power over telcos? This is an issue we have been and will be watching closely, as it is of great importance to many of our credit repair clients. We examine this case in detail.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    Customer complaints about telcos are astoundingly voluminous – with recent statistics showing there were 22,918 mobile complaints to the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman in the January-March 2013 quarter alone.

    The TCP Code, overseen by the ACMA was devised in order to encourage better behaviour amongst Australian telcos who were doing pretty poorly in many areas according to the ACMA’s report into their extensive telco inquiry, Reconnecting the Customer.

    Since the new TCP Code was registered in September 2012, the ACMA has been checking the compliance of telco providers with key new consumer protections – including new advertising rules, the requirement for Critical Information Statements and the requirement for providers to submit their own compliance assessments to industry body Communications Compliance.

    The ACMA reports it has:

    Made over 330 inquiries with providers about TCP compliance issues

    Issued 8 Formal Warnings and

    Given 3 Directions to Comply.

    The Telstra case is a significant example. The case in a nutshell, was reported by Adam Turner for Brisbane Times:

    Australian Communications and Media Authority has let Telstra off with a warning after the telco waited three years to investigate a billing error through which Australians travelling abroad were overcharged by about $30 million for services. About 260,000 customers were affected by the error between 2006 and 2012, caused by incorrect data-usage details being passed to Telstra by a data-clearing warehouse used by international carriers. As a result, some Telstra customers paid the 50¢ flagfall fee more than once each time they used mobile data on their phones while travelling.

    Customers raised concerns in 2009 but Telstra failed to investigate the problem until 2012, when it reported it to the ACMA.

    The ACMA report found Telstra in breach of the Telecommunications Consumer Protection Code, as the global roaming billing errors after 2009 were attributable to the telco’s failure to investigate the problem.

    ACMA found Telstra in breach of the consumer code, but it has the power to issue only a warning rather than a fine.

    Some have argued after the final TCP Code was approved by the ACMA, the end result was a fairly watered down Code with no ‘teeth’ to exert real penalties for breaches. In addition, the Australian Communications Consumer Action Network (ACCAN) issued a statement in July criticising the ACMA for not penalising telcos who breach the code.

    “The ACMA investigation shows telcos are in breach of the TCP Code on a daily basis,” an ACCAN spokesman said.

    “We are encouraged to see the ACMA investigating these breaches. However, the regulator’s unwillingness to hand down even the most basic available penalty for confirmed breaches has the potential to create a culture of poor compliance.”

    This may pan out to be largely right, but this Telstra case may not be the one to base that judgement on. The ACMA went into detail in a release to the media about why it chose to only warn the telco:

    The ACMA’s decision on this occasion to formally warn Telstra for the breach took into account the facts that Telstra was not the original cause of the problem; that this was the first time a billing issue of this nature had been investigated under the TCP Code; that Telstra itself reported the matter; and that Telstra appears to be otherwise currently compliant with the relevant parts of the TCP Code 2012. Importantly, Telstra proactively implemented a comprehensive program of compensation that mitigated the harm for affected customers.

    However, it does highlight the culture of difficulty when it comes to customer complaints which was so evident from the ACMA’s original investigation into the behaviour of Australian telcos across the board, and which has been an issue amongst our telco credit repair customers.

    ACMA chairman Chris Chapman said in his statement to the media the situation highlights the need for telcos to take customer complaints more seriously.

    ”Our investigation makes it very clear that all telcos need to listen to their customers who report billing problems and be vigilant about any potential issues with the information provided to them by third parties,” he says.

    The ACMA’s focus over the next quarter will be on checking compliance with the new requirement that telco providers notify customers on included value plans when they have used 50%, 85% and 100% of their included allowance. This was another major complaint coming out of the ACMA’s Reconnecting the Customer report and one which has also impacted the credit files of telco customers.

    We will be watching really closely how this pans out, and reporting on the positive and negative ramifications for consumers and their credit files.

    Image: adamr/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net

  • Telcos to step up spend management awareness under TCP Code

    bill shockBILL SHOCK!

    We’ve discussed it frequently. We hear about it frequently as credit repairers. Next month, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is overseeing new guidelines under the Telecommunications Consumer Protection Code (TCP) designed to reduce the instances of bill shock, and hopefully the frequency of credit disputes over bill shock. The new requirements are about to take effect from 1 September. We look at what the new Code requires and what it will mean for consumers.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    Botched phone plans and lack of data usage monitoring has in the past left many Australians shell shocked over their mobile and internet bills, with bills so large many can’t pay up or refuse to pay up, leading to an increased rate of defaults.

    Consumers have been confused when it comes to data allowance – particularly on their smartphones, and this was a major focus following the ACMA’s Reconnecting the Customer inquiry – which found there was a real need for improvement in consumer protection in the telco industry in the areas of Critical Information Summaries, clearer advertising and improved complaint handling.

    In the past clients claim they have gone over their allowance really quickly, sometimes without realising it, or the plan they were put on was not appropriate for what they intended to use their mobile internet for. Often they have had great difficulty in cancelling the accounts or coming to a resolution with telcos over these billing issues.

    Sometimes consumers have reluctantly paid the bill, thought the matter was settled, only to find they were defaulted anyway, and others have just refused to pay the bill until they got some resolution. Either way, they have been faced with at least 5 years of bad credit from the episode unless they have been able to make a successful complaint.

    Last year, the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO) surveyed its services. It counted 52,231 new complaints about telcos received between January and March 2012. Almost two-thirds were about mobile phone services.

    The TIO reports new complaints about over-commitment caused by inadequate spend controls increased to 4,282 in the January-March 2012 quarter, compared to 2,181 in the same quarter in 2011. In the same periods, new complaints about disputed internet charges increased from 981 to 2,823 (180 per cent).

    “It is well known that more internet browsing and downloads are now done on mobile phones and other mobile devices. With this change in consumer behaviour, we have seen complaints about excess data charges almost treble over the last year,” Ombudsman Simon Cohen said.  “The incidence of these complaints will reduce if consumers are only contracted for services they can afford, and where spend management tools such as notifications and usage meters are accurate and reliable”.

    SPEND MANAGEMENT TOOLS FOR TELCO CUSTOMERS

    From 1 September, 2013, spend management alerts, in addition to a range of new tools introduced for telco consumers following registration of the TCP code by the ACMA, will take effect. The changes include:

    • Residential customers on post-paid mobile and internet plans (with the potential for excess usage charges) will receive email updates when their data usage reaches 50 per cent, 85 per cent and 100 per cent of the amount included in their plan
    • Residential customers of the largest three mobile providers—Optus, Telstra and Vodafone—will also, from that date, receive SMS alerts when usage of their included value for calls and SMS reaches 50, 85 and 100 per cent.
    • The warnings at the 100 per cent usage mark must also include details of excess usage charges, which can be considerably higher than charges within the plan.

    ‘These notifications target customers most at risk of bill shock and represent an enormous industry reform by placing the power of information in the hands of consumers when they need it,’ said ACMA Chairman, Chris Chapman.

    Customers will not receive the warnings if they are on a plan which does not expose them to bill shock. This includes plans that are a pre-paid service, have a hard cap, or are an unlimited service, a dial-up internet service or are a shaped internet service, (i.e. which slows data rather than imposes excess usage charges when customers reach their data usage limit). The warnings are not mandatory for mobile plans launched prior to 1 March, 2012.

    The final element of the new TCP code, developed by Communications Alliance, rolls out in September 2014 when customers of the mid-sized and small telcos (less than 100,000 customers on included value plans) receive voice and SMS usage alerts to accompany their data alerts.

    Image: artur84/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net

  • Vodafone customers – ‘desperate and defaulted.’

    20070920 Image Close up of credit card bill iStock_000003981197Large GDOE 01Media Release

    Vodafone customers – ‘desperate and defaulted.’

    5 March 2013

    A Queensland family should have been relaxing in their newly purchased home after an interstate transfer, but instead they have been fighting Vodafone over a default which saw them lose their house contract – a default which they say, was ludicrous.

    Up till now, Alastair and Nikki Taylor have not been able to join the 20,000-plus Vodafone customers who are mounting a class action against the telco, because doing so could have damaged their dispute case against their Vodafone default listing.

    The default listing which has been proven to be unlawful and finally been removed by Vodafone today, saw them cop what they say, is an unfair and incorrect 5-year default on their credit file.

    “This default was stopping us from getting a home, and it is grossly unfair the time and money we have lost, not to mention the stress it has caused our family,” Alastair says.

    Alastair and Nikki purchased a wireless internet modem from a Vodafone store in Western Australia, but claim they were misled about the internet coverage it would provide.

    “At the time we verified with the sales assistant many times if it would work in the address we intended to move to as we had recently bought a new house. She assured us we would have full coverage. Upon arriving at our new address we found we were absolutely without coverage,” Alastair says.

    He says he contacted the store at least ten times, leaving messages and getting no response.

    “When I did finally get to talk to someone they rudely hung up on me. The next time I spoke to somebody, was when a debt collector called chasing the outstanding money around two months later. I told them the situation but they wouldn’t listen and were only interested in getting the money out of me,” he says.

    The couple begrudgingly paid the account late last year, when Alastair got an interstate transfer. They were told the outstanding account was affecting their credit rating and stalling their purchase of a home in Cairns.

    “We had no idea we were defaulted anyway whether we had paid the account or not. We lost the house we were after, and have had a lengthy battle with Vodafone to remove it,” Alastair says.

    Their advocate, MyCRA Credit Rating Repair’s Graham Doessel says they are certainly not alone in their experience.

    “Many telcos have historically poor levels of customer service and many times customers don’t get what they think they are paying for. What’s worse is when those botched plans end up costing the customer their credit file,” Mr Doessel says.

    The Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman’s annual report, released in October last year shows a rise in complaints about credit default listings. Complaints about consumers being credit default listed while their debt was in dispute increased 18 per cent from 3,700 to 4,370.

    “I am very concerned about the increase in the number of complaints where credit default listings are disputed,” Mr Cohen said “Credit listings can have very significant impacts on people – affecting applications for credit, including for housing and personal loans. Any credit default listing should only occur after the correct procedures have been followed.”

    Mr Doessel says preventing and disputing a credit file default from a telco often comes down to awareness of legalities.

    “Many people don’t know the rules well enough when dealing with these big companies, so it can be a little like David and Goliath and many times the big guy wins,” he says.

    He says his clients encounter difficulties with telcos at many levels.

    “In our experience it’s not just the initial sale of product which is in dispute, but the entire customer service process and often the process of default listing the client as well,” he says.

    He is hoping the very public class action will be a force of change, especially following the introduction of tougher laws for telcos in September last year.

    The ‘Telecommunications Consumer Protection Code’ was pushed through with the guidance of the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) which have amongst other things aimed to facilitate faster, better complaints-handling, with urgent complaints resolved within two days.

    ACMA Chairman Chris Chapman said at the time the ACMA would put the industry on notice, advising they would take a “far more robust approach” to ensure the industry’s compliance with the new Code.

    You can find more information on disputing a default with your telco at the MyCRA website www.mycra.com.au.

    /ENDS.

    Please contact: Graham Doessel – Founder and CEO 3124 7133

    Lisa Brewster – Media Relations MyCRA media@mycra.com.au

    http://www.mycra.com.au/ www.mycra.com.au/blog 246 Stafford Rd, STAFFORD Qld

    MyCRA Credit Rating Repairs is Australia’s number one in credit rating repairs. We permanently remove defaults from credit files. CEO of MyCRA Graham Doessel is a frequent consumer spokesperson for credit reporting issues and is a founding member of the Credit Repair Industry Association of Australasia.

  • Have Your Say on Bill Shock

    Ever been overseas and returned home to find your mobile phone bill is as expensive as your plane ticket? You’re not alone. You may get a chance to have your say on what the telcos should do to stop bill shock and curb the excessively high data roaming charges which can see you in debt and threaten your credit rating in a new public consultation seeking to lift the telco industry.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repair www.fixmybadcredit.com.au, https://www.facebook.com/FixMyBadCredit.com.au.

    The Government is welcoming public consultation on new standards to help Australians avoid bill shock while using their mobile phone overseas.

    As part of new guidelines for Telcos, set out through the new Telecommunications Consumer Protection (TCP) Code, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) will begin consultation on developing an industry standard to help Australians best receive timely information about international roaming costs when they travel.

    Minister for Broadband, Communications, and the Digital Economy, Senator Stephen Conroy, said in a media release late last week that Australian consumers are being price gouged by telecommunications companies every time they want to make a mobile call, send a text or go online, when overseas.

    “The industry standard will be an important transparency measure. People will receive clear information about pricing, allowing them to better manage their spending and avoid bill shock.

    “We also expect that the extra scrutiny provided by the standard will encourage telecommunications companies to reduce their obscenely high prices and give consumers a better deal when they travel.”

    “I encourage everyone to have their say during this public consultation, which ends on 25 January,” Mr Conroy said.

    Here’s what the current draft standard proposes:

    A traveller receives two SMS messages when they switch on their phone when arriving overseas. The first would be sent within 10 minutes, warning the customer that extra charges will apply and allowing them to switch off international mobile roaming services.

    The second would arrive within 1 hour and must detail the cost for a standard call, an SMS, and 1Mb of data.

    The standard also requires mobile phone companies to develop cost effective monitoring tools for consumers to use when they travel overseas.

    The new standard is expected to be in operation by the middle of next year.

    In the past, we have found many times the telco customer has had difficulty disputing their phone charges before they are issued with a credit default. These credit listings can be hard to fight. Often the customer will say what they had first understood the plan to be for, or what they wanted the phone to do, was not what eventuated. This can come down to a he-said she-said situation, and the telcos – with all the power on their side can often come out on top.

    As credit repairers we see many telco customers for various reasons – in fact almost 26% of our credit repair clients have telco credit listings they need removed. Many complain of confusion over bills, date allowance and plans and also difficulties with resolving disputes – which see customers with bad credit even though they had been attempting to sort out the bill discrepancy.

    The multitude of official complaints in the area of ‘bill shock’ resulted in a major inquiry by the ACMA and the report – Reconnecting the Customer. This examined the root causes of the industry’s poor customer service and complaints-handling performance. The telco industry was asked to regulate or be regulated – and so the TCP Code was developed by the Communications Alliance (CA), and a final draft was registered in late July.

    That TCP Code came into effect on 1 September 2012. If the code proves to be effective, there will be significant positive changes for telco customers. This public consultation and is one such proposed change coming to fruition.

    So get in and have your say,

    ACMA public consultation: http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_600133

  • Telco bill shock should in theory now be a thing of the past

    The Telecommunications Consumer Protection (TCP) Code came into effect on September 1. We look at what this means for telco customers and the possibility that less consumers could be subject to bill shock and subsequent credit rating defaults due to sky-high bills they had not budgeted for.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repairs and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    Currently approximately 26% of our credit repair clients have suffered bad credit from telcos (telecommunications providers). Not all of that bad credit should be there. Whilst mistakes and mis-communications are frequent in the industry, as they are in many others – one of the major significant differences we have noticed with the telco industry compared with other industries issuing credit file defaults, is more clients are in dispute over excess charges.

    Excess charges or “bill shock” can occur when the actual bill the customer receives is significantly higher than what they understand it should be. Issues like international roaming charges, excess data charges and customers going over plan allowances (especially when the plan had the term “cap” within it) seems to be a frequent source of dispute amongst customers.

    Unfortunately sometimes the customer is unable to come to an agreement over these charges before they are issued with a credit rating default. These issues can be hard to fight. Often the customer will say what they had first understood the plan to be for, or what they wanted the phone to do, was not what eventuated.

    Resolutions with telcos over these billing issues can be difficult to come to. Sometimes consumers have reluctantly paid the bill, thought the matter was settled, only to find they were defaulted anyway, and others have just refused to pay the bill until they got some resolution. Either way, customers have been faced with at least 5 years of bad credit from the episode unless they have been able to make a successful complaint.

    The telcos – with all the power on their side can often come out on top.

    Escalating levels of telco complaints in Australia, resulted in a major public inquiry by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) and the report – Reconnecting the Customer. This examined the root causes of the industry’s poor customer service and complaints-handling performance. The telco industry was asked to regulate or be regulated – and so the Telecommunciations Consumer Protections (TCP) Code was developed by the Communications Alliance (CA), and a final draft was registered in late July.

    That TCP Code came into effect on 1 September 2012. If the code proves to be effective, and if the ACMA does as it says it will and come down heavily on those that don’t comply with the TCP Code, there will be significant positive changes for telco customers.

    What the Code provides for.

    The ACMA outlines the basic benefits for consumers in its article Fair call—new telco code to benefit consumers. Here is a breakdown of consumer benefits of the TCP Code:

    • Telco providers must be clear about what they are offering in their phone plans and stop using confusing terms like ‘cap’ (unless the offer refers to a ‘hard cap’—an amount that cannot be exceeded).

    • Better spend management tools designed to avoid ‘bill shock’.Including improvements in billing processes and credit management, and the introduction of notifications about data usage and expenditure thresholds.

    • From 27 September telcos will be required to provide unit pricing for national calls, standard SMS and downloading 1 MB of data in advertisements.

    • From 1 March2013 customers buying a new service will receive a two-page document called the ‘Critical Information Summary’. This includes essential information about service, pricing and complaints-handling, as well as volumetric information so consumers can easily understand how many two-minute calls or texts they can make under their plan.

    • Faster, better complaints-handling, with urgent complaints resolved within two days. All of these new measures will be monitored and the telcos subject to new benchmarking standards.

    • For customers having difficulty paying their bills or meeting unexpectedly high bills, telcos must advise consumers about spend management tools, hardship advice and options to restrict a service.

    • A new industry compliance body is being formed to ensure all industry participants comply with the new code.

    According to IT Wire in its story New telco code toughens up consumer protections, Optus jumped the gun ahead of the introduction of the Code, and launched its new usage alert service which it says gives its customers greater transparency in managing spending on their mobile accounts. The new Optus service sends text alerts to Optus’ customers on most post-paid mobile plans when they reach 50 per cent, 85 per cent and 100 per cent of their voice, text and data allowance.

    IT Wire also reports ACMA Chairman Chris Chapman as saying the ACMA will put the industry on notice, advising they would take a “far more robust approach” to ensure the industry’s compliance with the new Code and had “resourced up in this space.”

    “We will conduct more audits and investigations dealing with key areas of consumer detriment and expect substantial changes in industry practices,” Mr Chapman says.

    For consumers who consider that their service provider is not complying with the code, Chapman says they “may make a complaint to the provider in the first instance and if they are not satisfied with the resolution, they should contact the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman.”

    And, if telecommunications service providers do not comply with the code, Chapman says they faced a direction to comply from the ACMA, “while further breaches could lead to Federal Court action where civil penalties of up to $250,000 are possible.”

    We will be following these telco improvements with great interest as they relate to the volume of credit file defaults due to telco customer service issues and bill disputes.

    For those consumers currently facing what they consider to be excessive charges, or other issues with their telco which have resulted in bad credit – it is possible MyCRA Credit Rating Repairs may be able to help.

    If a credit listing has been placed unlawfully, it may be required to be removed from the consumer’s credit file. Consumers can contact a credit repair advisor 1300 667 218 to assess their suitability for credit repair. There are no guarantees of success, but the specialised knowledge of credit reporting and industry law means engaging the services of a professional credit repairer gives the consumer the best chance of having bad credit removed completely and permanently from their credit file. Visit the main website for more information www.mycra.com.au.

  • ACMA is set to get tough on dodgy Telcos

    It seems regulators will be stamping their authority over Telcos that breach new customer service rules when they are released in a month’s time. We have been heavily following the introduction of these new laws as a much-needed safeguard for those consumers who have been suffering at the hands of poor advertising and complaints handling from the Telco industry. This has led to many defaults being unfairly placed on credit files, and also invariably sometimes credit file errors.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repairs and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    The Sydney Morning Herald reported yesterday in its story Regulator takes tougher stance with Telcos that in the lead up to the instigation of a new Telecommunications Consumer Protection Code, the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) is warning telcos it will have little patience for those that ignore the new regulations:

    “The communications regulator is warning of “more investigations [fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”][and] more court cases” against telcos that breach new customer service rules starting in four weeks.

    The new rules will stop telcos using the word “cap” and force them to offer clear pricing information, usage alerts and better complaint handling services. It also set up Communications Compliance – an industry funded body that will monitor breaches.
    General manager of content, consumer and citizen at the Australian Communications and Media Authority, Jennifer McNeill, said it will have little patience for telcos that flaunt the new Telecommunications Consumer Protection code.

    The ACMA previously used a gentle ‘engage and educate’ method to help telcos comply, but this attitude would be replaced with a tougher stance, she said.

    “You will see more investigations, more directions and more court cases,” she told a room full of telco industry representatives at a briefing.

    “We expect immediate compliance with the obligations that have been substantially carried over from the old code.”

    Ms McNeill said the ACMA would no longer tolerate “good natured incompetence” as an excuse for breaches and would also ask telcos to substantiate any unbelievable service offers. Staff had been shifted around within the ACMA to bulk up its ability to enforce compliance, she added.

    When the code starts on 1 September, if telco’s breach the code, the ACMA can direct them to comply with it.  If they don’t comply with the ACMA’s direction, the Federal Court can impose a penalty of up to $250,000.

    The industry body that drafted the code, Communications Alliance, is conducting briefings and training sessions around the country to help companies prepare for the changes.

    If your Telco has placed a default on your credit file which you believe is unfair, incorrect or just shouldn’t be there – then you may have grounds to request its removal from your credit file. To discover whether you may be a suitable candidate for credit file repair, give the MyCRA Credit Rating Repairs team a call on 1300 667 218.

    Image: Sura Nualpradid/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net[/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

  • Bill shock and telco complaints finally actioned: New Telco Consumer Protection Code approved by ACMA

    It has finally come to pass – telcos have a compulsory and enforceable code to govern their behaviour towards consumers. This new code is aimed at giving consumers the transparency and clarity with their telco use that has been severely lacking in the industry and which has led to bill shock, debt issues and more unfair credit listings such as credit rating defaults.  We report on the new code governing telcos, the possible benefits for the future, and explain how the previous code has impacted telco customer credit files.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repairs and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    Telcos have by the skin of their teeth missed government regulation. The final draft of a new Telecommunications Consumer Protection Code (TCP) submitted by telco industry body the Communciations Allicance has been approved by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) it was announced yesterday.

    A couple of weeks ago we reported telcos had submitted their last version of the Code to the ACMA in the post Telco consumer code on third rewrite for June deadline.

    The ACMA announced in a release to the media yesterday A Better Deal For Australian Telco Customers, that it had agreed to register the telco’s version of the Code, which is aimed at giving “long-suffering telco customers materially greater protection on the big telco issues such as bill shock, confusing mobile plans and poor complaints-handling,” the ACMA says.

    A public inquiry conducted by the ACMA estimated that the annual recurring costs associated with the industry’s unsatisfactory performance under the previous code included $1.5 billion associated with consumers choosing the wrong plan, $108 million for the costs of telephone complaints and $113 million for the costs of writing off bad debts.

    “The ACMA will very closely monitor its [fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”][the TCP Code’s] progress and will not hesitate to communicate to industry the need for further change, if that need arises. This is an important point as the code will apply to every service provider in Australia. Compliance with the code is no longer an option. The ACMA obviously stands ready to use its powers of investigation and enforcement if participants choose not to comply with these new code obligations (which include an obligation to report their compliance performance to the industry’s new compliance monitoring body, Communications Compliance),” Mr Chapman says.

    How have telco customers been affected?

    Recently the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO) surveyed its services. It counted 52,231 new complaints about telcos received between January and March 2012. Almost two-thirds were about mobile phone services.

    The TIO reports new complaints about over-commitment caused by inadequate spend controls increased to 4,282 in the January-March 2012 quarter, compared to 2,181 in the same quarter in 2011. In the same periods, new complaints about disputed internet charges increased from 981 to 2,823 (180 per cent).

    “It is well known that more internet browsing and downloads are now done on mobile phones and other mobile devices. With this change in consumer behaviour, we have seen complaints about excess data charges almost treble over the last year,” Ombudsman Simon Cohen said. “The incidence of these complaints will reduce if consumers are only contracted for services they can afford, and where spend management tools such as notifications and usage meters are accurate and reliable”.

    And customer credit files?

    Almost 26% of MyCRA’s credit repair clientele in the past 12 months were Telco customers.

    Often this was due to botched phone plans and lack of data usage monitoring. Consumers have been confused when it comes to data allowance on their smartphones, and the providers have not been helping. Often clients have claimed they have gone over their data limit really quickly, or the plan they were put on was not appropriate for what they intended to use their mobile internet for.

    The problems have also extended to complaints. Many customers can have had great difficulty in cancelling the accounts or coming to a resolution with telcos over these billing issues. Sometimes consumers have reluctantly paid the bill, thought the matter was settled, only to find they were defaulted anyway, and others have just refused to pay the bill until they got some resolution. Either way, customers have been faced with at least 5 years of bad credit from these often unfair credit listings unless they have been able to make a successful complaint.

    What the TCP Code will mean for consumers

    The Sydney Morning Herald yesterday reported in the story ‘Bill shock’ code set to save $1.5b on phone bills that the new 102 –page code will be enforced from September 1, and progressively phased in over the next two years.:

    “[We] are hopeful that its adoption will result in clearer advertising, easier comparison of products, better information about contracts and better tools to help consumers avoid bill shock,” Teresa Corbin, CEO of the Australian Communications Consumer Action Network (ACCAN), which proposed the code told SMH.

    It also reported on a significant change to data usage notification rules:

    “…customers will receive warning messages when they have reached 50 per cent, 85 per cent and 100 per cent of their monthly allowance for calls, messages and data,” SMH reports.

    The basic benefits are explained in more detail in the ACMA article Fair call—new telco code to benefit consumers:

    Under the new code, telco providers must be clear about what they are offering in their phone plans and stop using confusing terms like ‘cap’ (unless the offer refers to a ‘hard cap’—an amount that cannot be exceeded).

    Customers will also benefit from better spend management tools designed to avoid ‘bill shock’. These include improvements in billing processes and credit management, and the introduction of notifications about data usage and expenditure thresholds.
    Some of the changes will be phased in to help providers adjust their systems. From 27 September, customers will be able to more easily compare costs and plans, with telcos required to provide unit pricing for national calls, standard SMS and downloading 1 MB of data in advertisements…

    From 1 March2013 customers buying a new service will receive a two-page document called the ‘Critical Information Summary’. This includes essential information about service, pricing and complaints-handling, as well as volumetric information so consumers can easily understand how many two-minute calls or texts they can make under their plan.

    The new code will mean faster, better complaints-handling, with urgent complaints resolved within two days. All of these new measures will be monitored and the telcos subject to new benchmarking standards.

    For customers having difficulty paying their bills or meeting unexpectedly high bills, telcos must advise consumers about spend management tools, hardship advice and options to restrict a service.

    A new industry compliance body is being formed to ensure all industry participants comply with the new code.

    We eagerly await the September implementation of the TCP Code, and the positive impact this will have on our customer’s credit files and hopeful reduction in the number of unfair credit listings originating from telco customers.

    Image 1: Danilo Rizzuti/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net.

    Image 2: Sydney Morning Herald[/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

  • Telstra’s security slip-up was a breach of the Privacy Act

    Back in December 2011 a customer discovered the identity details of 734,000 Telstra Australia customers had been exposed to possible identity theft and misuse by being easily accessible through a Google search. The Privacy Commissioner, Timothy Pilgrim immediately stepped in to investigate. After a 6 month-long investigation, Mr Pilgrim and the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has found Telstra has breached both the Privacy Act, and the Telecommunications Consumer Protections Code. We look at how this occurred, and what the implications could be for Telstra, and for you and your credit file.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repairs and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    In the New Year, we reported on this massive privacy issue, which affected more than 700,000 customers, including myself in our post Telstra’s at it again. And this time it may affect YOU. Here is an excerpt from the December 12 media release:

    The Sydney Morning Herald reported on Friday a user of the Whirlpool forum stumbled upon the “Telstra bundles request search” page after doing a Google search for a Telstra customer support phone number they were told to contact.

    SMH reported the information of any Telstra customer was searchable even by last name, bringing up the customer’s account number, what broadband plan they were on, what other Telstra services they were signed up to and notes associated with the customers’ accounts including in many cases their usernames and passwords.

    There were also other details about technician visits, SMS messages sent to private mobile numbers and credit check details.
    Telstra has reportedly reset approximately 60,000 customer passwords as a precaution (http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/telstra-customers-face-password-reset-after-privacy-breach/story-e6frgakx-1226219541766).

    Telstra bundle customer, Graham Doessel is one of those potentially at risk.

    He also happens to be the CEO of a company dealing in credit repair for people who have been unlawfully blacklisted from borrowing facilities. He says as much as 50% of his clientele who present with credit file errors and inconsistencies are Telco customers, and many of those are Telstra customers.

    “This data breach is a crucial example of how errors occur so easily in the Telco industry. Unfortunately they have the potential to severely damage someone’s financial future.”

    “Every day we deal with customers who can’t get a home loan, because their credit rating is damaged by improper execution of policies and procedures in the Telco industry,” Mr Doessel, of MyCRA Credit Repairs says.

    Mr Doessel is concerned he is amongst those Telstra customers whose personally identifiable information may have been viewed, and copied for purposes of fraud during the time the information was readily available on the internet.

    “The issue is about both our possible stolen passwords, and our possible stolen personal details – a huge commodity for fraudsters. What’s to say fraudsters haven’t jumped on the internet while this information has been available and copied it?”

    “Personal details are the building blocks for constructing a fake identity. Once someone has fake ID documents, they can take out significant amounts of credit in the victim’s name. Often people don’t find out about it straight away and that can result in defaults from creditors and massive long term credit issues,” he says.

    Outcome of the investigation

    Mr Pilgrim found in his investigation that a number of internal errors occurred in the lead up to the incident in December 2011.

    “I found the privacy breach occurred because of a series of errors revealing significant weaknesses in Telstra’s reporting, monitoring and accountability systems”, Mr Pilgrim said in a statement to the media.

    “Of particular concern is that a number of Telstra staff knew about the security issues with the database but did not raise them with management. This incident could have been easily avoided if appropriate planning was undertaken”.

    “The failure by Telstra to correctly categorise the database project in its design phase as one involving customer data meant that the database did not receive the appropriate level of protection from the very beginning”.

    The Commissioner found Telstra to be in breach of two National Privacy Principles under the Privacy Act 1988:
    •National Privacy Principle 2.1 (Use and disclosure)
    •National Privacy Principle 4.1 (Data security)

    Mr Pilgrim warned businesses of the importance of conducting a Privacy Impact Assessment (or PIA) when commencing new projects.

    “Build your privacy in at the beginning, don’t bolt it on as an afterthought. All businesses should conduct a PIA to make sure that potential privacy risks are considered at the start of any project and that risk mitigation strategies are put in place”.

    Implications for Telstra

    Telstra has committed to a remediation project to introduce significant measures to protect the security of the personal information it holds and prevent unauthorised access and disclosure in the future. The Commissioner closed the investigation after reviewing the remediation plans Telstra has in place.

    In ceasing his investigation into the matter, the Commissioner asked Telstra to provide him with a report on the progress of the remediation project by October 2012. He also asked Telstra to provide to him with a report on the completion of the remediation project by April 2013.

    No penalties enforced

    Mr Pilgrim said The Privacy Act does not give him the power to impose any penalties or seek enforceable undertakings from organisations he has investigated on his own initiative. However, he did say the privacy law reforms that are currently before Parliament – the Privacy Amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) Bill 2012 will provide him with additional powers and remedies when conducting such investigations in the future.

    The Sydney Morning Herald reported in its article Telstra’s 734,000 account privacy blunder breached multiple laws: regulators that Telstra appears to have escaped financial or other penalties for now, which has angered consumer groups.

    “We strongly believe the ACMA needs stronger enforcement powers for the Code to be effective,” said Elise Davidson of the Australian Communications Consumer Action Network.

    “The ACMA is currently considering a new draft of the TCP Code but – regardless of what’s in it – without effective enforcement, telecommunication providers can continue to seriously breach their obligations without fear of any fines or sanctions from the regulator.”

    And Yet Still More Data Exposed

    Even before the deliverance of the Privacy Commissioner’s finding on the account scandal, Telstra has also been embroiled in another data scandal involving the tracking of its customer’s internet data useage. The ABC reports in its article Telstra accused of tracking Next G internet use:

    Telstra has been accused of tracking the internet use of its Next G mobile phone users and sending their internet history to a company in the United States.

    One of the telco’s customers discovered that when he visited a website using his Next G network in Australia, a server in the United States would visit the same address almost instantly.

    Telstra says it is collecting the information for use in a new internet filter product, but internet users are outraged and are demanding the Australian Privacy Commissioner investigate.

    For an update to how this particular breach occurred, and what has been discovered so far, check out the IT News article Telstra: Oh what a tangled web we weave written yesterday.

     

    Perhaps not Telstra’s finest hour on Privacy Issues, nor Australia’s finest hour on Privacy Law.

    How To Protect Your Credit File After a Data Breach

    Whilst there have been no official reports of any identity theft cases from this particular security breach, we look at what you should if you find yourself in this situation in the future, with any company that holds your personal information.

    1. Change passwords. Even if Telstra hasn’t advised you otherwise, go in and change your password. If you have that same password for unrelated accounts, change that as well.
    2. Check your credit file. Obtain a free copy of your credit file and check there is nothing suspicious already present on your credit file.
    If you see suspicious activity on your credit file, or your credit accounts….
    3. Alert your Creditors you may be at risk of identity theft. This will allow them to ‘flag’ your accounts and halt any suspicious activity.
    4. Alert credit reporting agencies. They can put an alert on your credit file which informs you of any changes to contact details, or suspicious credit enquiries you may not have initiated.
    5. Consider making a complaint to the Privacy Commissioner. If you firmly believe you have been a victim of identity theft through a company data breach or breach of personal information, you should visit the Privacy Commissioner’s website to determine if you have a valid complaint to make, and how to go about making it. http://www.privacy.gov.au/complaints.
    6. If your credit file has been damaged, get help to repair it. If you have been exposed to identity theft, and you have credit listings which should not be there, contact a professional credit repairer, who can talk to you about clearing your bad credit and recovering your good name.

    Image: Stuart Miles / www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net

     

     

  • Telco consumer code on third rewrite for June deadline

    A third shot at a telecommunications consumer code has recently been submitted by Telcos to the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). The Code submission is an attempt to self-regulate a heavily criticised industry and prevent Government intervention by the end of June deadline.  The Code is intended as a resolution to an 18-month investigation by the ACMA into telco customer complaints. As Telco disputes make up a heavy part of credit rating errors to date, we have been watching the outcome of this situation and how it could impact the consumer’s ability to resolve disputes, and prevent credit file errors and default listings which should not be there.

    By Graham Doessel, Founder and CEO of MyCRA Credit Rating Repairs and www.fixmybadcredit.com.au.

    IT News recently reported on developments of the Telecommunications Consumer Protection (TCP) Code in its article ACMA Sets June Deadline for Consumer Code.

    It reports that the ACMA has committed to deciding on whether to accept or reject a revised telco industry code on customer service and advertising by the end of the month, in preparation for registration and implementation by August 1.

    “We indicated that the previous ones that they had lodged with us wouldn’t secure registration,” ACMA chairman Chris Chapman told iTnews.

    Here is an excerpt from that story:

    It is understood the watchdog has already held meetings to discuss the May revision of the code, the largest revision of which included the concession for telcos to print unit pricing for SMS messages, phone calls and data blocks on outdoor advertising and flyers.

    It has previously opposed the move as unnecessary, despite attacks by consumer representative group ACCAN.

    Chapman threatened in April to directly regulate the industry if it ultimately declined to register the code, even on minor grounds.

    At the time, Chapman said the March revision of the code would be the final one for consideration. But ongoing discussions with industry led to one more version of the document ultimately being considered…

    It was initially submitted to the ACMA for registration in February but has since undergone two revisions as the ACMA declined to register the revised code over concerns it did not meet all recommendations laid out by the inquiry.

    “We absolutely believe that this code is complete, that it meets not just the requirements of the [fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”][Reconnecting the Customer] enquiry, it also meets the test of being the best and most sensible code we can put in place to enhance consumer protections and provide a win-win for consumers and the industry,” Communications Alliance chief executive John Stanton told iTnews.

     

    The ACMA  formally invited the industry to incorporate the following changes to its Telecommunications Consumer Protection (TCP) Code in its report Reconnecting the Customer:

    1.Clearer pricing information in advertisements allowing consumers to more easily compare services.
    2.Improved and more consistent pre-sale information about plans.
    3.Developing meaningful performance metrics which allow consumers to compare providers.
    4.Tools for consumers to monitor usage and expenditure.
    5.Better complaints-handling by providers.

    A shake up in the Telco industry is long overdue. Australians have been caught out time and again with botched bills and unresolved disputes with their Telco providers and their credit files have been damaged as a result.

    The Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO) revealed its findings on the extent of discontent within the industry in a survey of more than 500 Telco customers who had lodged complaints between July and August 2010.

    The TIO survey revealed more than half of consumers reported contact with their service providers five or more times before ringing the TIO. It also revealed most consumers reported spending three hours or more unsuccessfully trying to solve their complaint, with one in 5 saying they spent more than nine hours.

    “Consumers who come to the TIO report spending substantial time and effort solving their complaints,” said Ombudsman Simon Cohen.

    “They report being transferred from department to department, not being transferred to supervisors and, perhaps most frustratingly, getting no solution or a broken promise for their efforts. They are – by any measure – resilient consumers.”

    When disputing bills with the Telco industry, many people are unfairly penalised with a bad credit rating when the matter could have been dealt with better by the Telco in the first place. There is a great number of Telco credit file listings which contain errors, or have been put there unjustly or unfairly. Under current legislation, people do have the right to have credit file discrepancies resolved. But unfortunately it can be difficult for customers if they are not aware of the appropriate legislation and don’t have time to negotiate with creditors.

    MyCRA sends out complaints regularly to the TIO requesting investigations into errors that have found their way onto customer credit files.

    Hopefully these changes will result in less confusion and complaints in general amongst Telco customers and fewer people who have their good name destroyed unnecessarily due to credit file defaults which should not be there.

    For help with removing credit rating errors from credit files, contact MyCRA Credit Rating Repairs on 1300 667 218 or visit the main website www.mycra.com.au.

    Image: David Castillo Dominici/ www.FreeDigitalPhotos.net[/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]

  • New recommendations to protect Telco customers welcomed

    Media Release
    12 September

    Changes recommended by The Australian Communications and Media Authority in its final report into the telecommunications industry should finally see Telcos held accountable for poor customer service and complaints handling, according to a national credit repairer.

    Director of MyCRA Credit Repairs, Graham Doessel says if the ACMA’S changes are implemented swiftly across the industry, customers should reap the rewards.

    “A shake up in the Telco industry is long overdue. Australians have been caught out time and again with botched bills and unresolved disputes with their Telco providers and their credit files have been damaged as a result,” Mr Doessel says.

    He says about one third of his credit repair clients have had issues with their Telco provider which has left them out of pocket or facing black marks on their credit rating.

    “Our clients have suffered greatly for the inadequate policies and procedures of many of the Telco providers in this country. We send out far too many complaints every day to the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO) requesting investigations into errors that have found their way onto customer’s credit files,” he says.

    The ACMA is formally inviting the industry to incorporate the following changes to its Telecommunications Consumer Protection (TCP) Code by February 2012:

    1.Clearer pricing information in advertisements allowing consumers to more easily compare services.
    2.Improved and more consistent pre-sale information about plans.
    3.Developing meaningful performance metrics which allow consumers to compare providers.
    4.Tools for consumers to monitor usage and expenditure.
    5.Better complaints-handling by providers.

    “We have closely consulted on these outcomes with consumers and industry and the overwhelming response has been that improvements are both urgent and necessary,” ACMA Chairman, Chris Chapman says.

    The ACMA says if the Telecommunications industry fails to develop a code that addresses these concerns, the ACMA will mandate the changes through direct regulation.

    The Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman recently revealed its findings on the extent of discontent within the industry in a report released last month from a survey of more than 500 Telco customers who had lodged complaints between July and August 2010.

    The survey revealed more than half of consumers reported contact with their service providers five or more times before ringing the TIO. It also revealed most consumers reported spending three hours or more unsuccessfully trying to solve their complaint, with one in 5 saying they spent more than nine hours.

    “Consumers who come to the TIO report spending substantial time and effort solving their complaints,” said Ombudsman Simon Cohen. “They report being transferred from department to department, not being transferred to supervisors and, perhaps most frustratingly, getting no solution or a broken promise for their efforts. They are – by any measure – resilient consumers.”

    Mr Doessel says when disputing bills with the Telco industry, many people are unfairly penalised with a bad credit rating when the matter could have been dealt with better by the Telco in the first place.

    “It is astounding the number of Telco credit file listings which contain errors, or have been put there unjustly or unfairly. Under current legislation, people do have the right to have credit file discrepancies resolved. But unfortunately it can be difficult for customers if they are not aware of the appropriate legislation and don’t have time to negotiate with creditors,” he says.

    Under current legislation, an account which is more than 60 days in arrears can be listed by the creditor as being unpaid on the customer’s credit file. This ‘default’ is generally listed on a person’s credit file regardless of whether they believe there are errors in the details of the bill or with the payment amount.

    “Defaults remain on a person’s credit file for 5 years. Currently, defaults – even those that are marked as ‘paid’, will prevent people from obtaining a home loan with most lenders. In fact, even having a few too many credit enquiries can be enough for an automatic decline” he says.

    Mr Doessel is hoping the ACMA’s recommendations are taken on board swiftly to ensure a more transparent industry.

    “Hopefully the changes will result in less confusion and complaints in general amongst Telco customers and fewer people who have their good name destroyed unnecessarily due to credit file defaults which should not be there,” he says.

    /ENDS

    Please contact:
    Lisa Brewster – Media Relations   Mob: 0450 554 007 media@mycra.com.au
    Graham Doessel – (07) 3124 7133  www.mycra.com.au/ www.mycra.com.au/blog

    MyCRA Credit Repairs is Australia’s leader in credit rating repairs. We permanently remove defaults from credit files.

    Links:
    http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_410157
    http://www.tio.com.au/media_statements/RELEASES/2011/08_12_Resilient_Consumers_Report.html

    Image: Stuart Miles / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

  • Has Telstra Put 220,000 Clients At Risk Of Identity Theft By Their Error?

    Telstr has sent out 220,000 ‘botched’ letters to clients with other customers information showing what Plans, Phone numbers, even Silent Numbers  and Names of other clients.

    This could SERIOUSLY affect the privacy of 220,000 people in a real way and The Australian Privacy Commissioner is not happy.

    The Australian Communications and Media Authority Chairman, Mr. Chris Chapman said yesterday “The main priority initially is to limit the damageto consumers caught up in

    [fusion_builder_container hundred_percent=”yes” overflow=”visible”][fusion_builder_row][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”]

    Chris Chapman photo
    Chris Chapman, Chairman of the ACMA

    this mail out and where possible to ensure remedies are quickly implimented.”

    “I have spoken with Telstra and they have assured us they will fully co-operate with the ACMA and other regulatory agencies to minimise the fall out for customers,” Mr Chapman said.

    Mr. Timmothy Pilgrim  (The Australian Privacy Commisioner) has advised that his office will commence an investigation into the matter.

    Mr. Pilgrim went on to say, “While I welcome Telstra’s prompt advice that this incident occurred and that it has taken steps to contact affected customers, I am concerned about the amount of personal information that has been disclosed which includes potentially sensitive information such as silent numbers.”

    “Customers expect their personal data to be protected by organisations and incidents such as this are very serious. For this reason my Office will be opening an investigation into the matter today,” Mr. Pilgrim continued.

    Telstra has acted quickly to set up a hotline for its affected customers 1800 307 987.

    Graham Doessel CEO of National Credit File Repair Firm My CRA said, “While Telstra,

    [/fusion_builder_column][fusion_builder_column type=”1_1″ background_position=”left top” background_color=”” border_size=”” border_color=”” border_style=”solid” spacing=”yes” background_image=”” background_repeat=”no-repeat” padding=”” margin_top=”0px” margin_bottom=”0px” class=”” id=”” animation_type=”” animation_speed=”0.3″ animation_direction=”left” hide_on_mobile=”no” center_content=”no” min_height=”none”]

    Graham Doessel Photo
    Graham Doessel, MyCRA CEO

    The Privacy Commissioner and The ACMA are all working together to get this mess cleaned up, the simple truth is the damage has already been done.  The amount of information contained in these letters could be the last piece in the Identity Theft Puzzle.”

    “There are organised gangs that actually go through peoples rubbish just looking for discarded rates notices, phone bills, credit card and bank statements, old rego papers and anything else they can use to convince the authorities that they are you,” Graham Doessel continued.

    Mr. Doessel also commented, “Once the organised gangs have come back enough times (can take many months), got the paperwork they need, they will systematically go about building a copy of your identity.  Then they can access bank accounts, get credit cards, apply for loans, phone accounts, and in some cases, buy property in your name. Some have even mortgaged or sold the family home of their Identity Theft Victims.”

    A 2007 Australian Breau of Statistics survey shows over 500,000 people in Australia have been victim of Identity Fraud, with the majority coming from Credit or Bank Card Fraud.

    If you think there is even a small chance that you may be the victim of Identity Fraud, (also known as Identity Theft) the simplest thing you can do is to contact www.MyCreditFile.com.au  and request a Free copy of your credit file.

    You are entitled to one free copy of your credit report ever year and it will arive within 10 working days.  If you need a copy of your credit rating any sooner, you can pay a small fee to have it emailed to you within a couple of hours.

    If you do discover there are concering entries on your credit rating, you have hte right to contest those and potentially have them ammended or removed.

    Contact your creditor and ask that the items are updated or removed though we do find that unfortunately many clients are bluffed by their creditors and are unsuccessful after many months of trying.

    If you are time poor or just want he best chance of repairing your credit rating, investigate the option of engaging a professional credit repair firm.

    All professional credit repair firms will have a detailed website, publish all of their prices, have success stories from real clients and display their success rates.

    Do your home work and then get your financial integrity back.[/fusion_builder_column][/fusion_builder_row][/fusion_builder_container]